Re: svn commit: r1561926 - /jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-core-0.15.2/pom.xml

2014-01-28 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:41 AM, tri...@apache.org wrote: + org.apache.jackrabbit.oak;version=0.15.0, + org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.api;version=0.15.0, + org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.api.jmx;version=0.15.0, We should version packages independent of Oak

Separating API/SPI in different bundles (was: svn commit: r1561926 - /jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-core-0.15.2/pom.xml)

2014-01-28 Thread Tobias Bocanegra
Hi, On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:41 AM, tri...@apache.org wrote: + org.apache.jackrabbit.oak;version=0.15.0, + org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.api;version=0.15.0, +

Re: Separating API/SPI in different bundles (was: svn commit: r1561926 - /jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-core-0.15.2/pom.xml)

2014-01-28 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote: I also think that the amount of exported packages is very large. It looks like we didn't really know how to modularize oak and just exported basically everything :-) That's a pretty broad statement. Yes, there are