On 15/10/2014 09:54, Alex Parvulescu wrote:
>> Does the OSGi config allow comments?
> Not sure, I haven't seen license headers in config files so far, but maybe
> that's possible.
>
.config files looks like standard java properies one. if so it should be
possible to add comments by preceding the li
Hi,
Guys, thanks for the suggestions!
> May be better to exclude all under osgi-conf from license check
I did not want to extend the ignores more than they need to, so I would
leave them as is for now.
> Does the OSGi config allow comments?
Not sure, I haven't seen license headers in config file
Does the OSGi config allow comments? If it does, we could simply add
the license header to those files...
Regards
Marcel
On 15/10/14 10:22, "Chetan Mehrotra" wrote:
>May be better to exclude all under osgi-conf from license check
>
>osgi-conf/**/*.*
>Chetan Mehrotra
>
>
>On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 a
May be better to exclude all under osgi-conf from license check
osgi-conf/**/*.*
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:39 PM, wrote:
> Author: alexparvulescu
> Date: Wed Oct 15 08:09:01 2014
> New Revision: 1631967
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1631967
> Log:
> OAK-2189 TarMK cold standb