Re: svn commit: r1631967 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-tarmk-failover/pom.xml

2014-10-16 Thread Davide Giannella
On 15/10/2014 09:54, Alex Parvulescu wrote: >> Does the OSGi config allow comments? > Not sure, I haven't seen license headers in config files so far, but maybe > that's possible. > .config files looks like standard java properies one. if so it should be possible to add comments by preceding the li

Re: svn commit: r1631967 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-tarmk-failover/pom.xml

2014-10-15 Thread Alex Parvulescu
Hi, Guys, thanks for the suggestions! > May be better to exclude all under osgi-conf from license check I did not want to extend the ignores more than they need to, so I would leave them as is for now. > Does the OSGi config allow comments? Not sure, I haven't seen license headers in config file

Re: svn commit: r1631967 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-tarmk-failover/pom.xml

2014-10-15 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Does the OSGi config allow comments? If it does, we could simply add the license header to those files... Regards Marcel On 15/10/14 10:22, "Chetan Mehrotra" wrote: >May be better to exclude all under osgi-conf from license check > >osgi-conf/**/*.* >Chetan Mehrotra > > >On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 a

Re: svn commit: r1631967 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-tarmk-failover/pom.xml

2014-10-15 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
May be better to exclude all under osgi-conf from license check osgi-conf/**/*.* Chetan Mehrotra On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:39 PM, wrote: > Author: alexparvulescu > Date: Wed Oct 15 08:09:01 2014 > New Revision: 1631967 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1631967 > Log: > OAK-2189 TarMK cold standb