[jira] [Commented] (OAK-550) PropertyLocation#remove always returns true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549821#comment-13549821 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-550: --- The Javadoc might be terse but I think the implementat

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-524) Implement PrincipalManager#getPrincipals(int searchType)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] angela resolved OAK-524. Resolution: Fixed > Implement PrincipalManager#getPrincipals(int searchType) > --

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-549) PropertyLocation#remove not part of TreeLocation API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] angela resolved OAK-549. Resolution: Fixed fixed at revision: 1431499 > PropertyLocation#remove not part of TreeLocation API >

[jira] [Created] (OAK-550) PropertyLocation#remove always returns true

angela created OAK-550: -- Summary: PropertyLocation#remove always returns true Key: OAK-550 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-550 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Bug Components

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-549) PropertyLocation#remove not part of TreeLocation API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549780#comment-13549780 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-549: --- Yes, makes sense. +1 for the patch. >

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-549) PropertyLocation#remove not part of TreeLocation API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] angela updated OAK-549: --- Attachment: OAK-549.patch > PropertyLocation#remove not part of TreeLocation API > -

[jira] [Created] (OAK-549) PropertyLocation#remove not part of TreeLocation API

angela created OAK-549: -- Summary: PropertyLocation#remove not part of TreeLocation API Key: OAK-549 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-549 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Bug C

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-548) Moving larger trees cause OutOfMemoryError

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549741#comment-13549741 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-548: --- Running them same test against the [POC implementatio

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-548) Moving larger trees cause OutOfMemoryError

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549739#comment-13549739 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-548: --- Running them same test against the [POC implementatio

[jira] [Created] (OAK-548) Moving larger trees cause OutOfMemoryError

Michael Dürig created OAK-548: - Summary: Moving larger trees cause OutOfMemoryError Key: OAK-548 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-548 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-536) Implement rebase for branches in Microkernel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549731#comment-13549731 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-536: --- Here is a POC implementation on how to use this from o

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-464) RootImpl.rebase() doesn't handle move operations correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549723#comment-13549723 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-464: --- I updated the POC on my private GitHub page to use the

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-547) Property2Index: getCost reads all nodes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Mueller resolved OAK-547. Resolution: Fixed Revision 1431411: now only up to 100 matching nodes are read > Prop

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-507) MicroKernel.commit() throws NotFoundException for an existing node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger resolved OAK-507. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.6 Committed the patch in revision: 1431409. There are s

[jira] [Created] (OAK-547) Property2Index: getCost reads all nodes

Thomas Mueller created OAK-547: -- Summary: Property2Index: getCost reads all nodes Key: OAK-547 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-547 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-507) MicroKernel.commit() throws NotFoundException for an existing node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger updated OAK-507: - Attachment: OAK-507.patch Updated the patch with an additional fix for moves in a branch.

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-546) Query: unexpected result on negative limit / offset

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549682#comment-13549682 ] Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-546: Jackrabbit 2.x also throws an exception on negative

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-536) Implement rebase for branches in Microkernel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Dürig updated OAK-536: -- Attachment: OAK-536.patch updated patch fixing a few issues. > Implement rebase for bran

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-545) PrincipalManager#findPrincipal should not search for exact name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Mueller resolved OAK-545. Resolution: Fixed The tests are now enabled > PrincipalManager#findPrincipal should n

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-546) Query: unexpected result on negative limit / offset

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Mueller resolved OAK-546. Resolution: Fixed Revision 1431357 (oak-core) and revision 1431360 (oak-jcr): throw IllegalArgumentEx

[jira] [Created] (OAK-546) Query: unexpected result on negative limit / offset

Thomas Mueller created OAK-546: -- Summary: Query: unexpected result on negative limit / offset Key: OAK-546 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-546 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (OAK-545) PrincipalManager#findPrincipal should not search for exact name

angela created OAK-545: -- Summary: PrincipalManager#findPrincipal should not search for exact name Key: OAK-545 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-545 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Sub

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-402) Refactor query and index tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Mueller resolved OAK-402. Resolution: Won't Fix I think the current solution (override AbstractQueryTest) is actually good enou

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-507) MicroKernel.commit() throws NotFoundException for an existing node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549496#comment-13549496 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-507: --- bq. I think it's expected to fail because it's not cle

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-507) MicroKernel.commit() throws NotFoundException for an existing node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549492#comment-13549492 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-507: -- bq. We already have commit variable to read the

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-507) MicroKernel.commit() throws NotFoundException for an existing node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549487#comment-13549487 ] Mete Atamel commented on OAK-507: - The patch looks good. The only minor thing is whether init

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-537) The Property2Index eagerly and unnecessarily fetches all data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Mueller resolved OAK-537. Resolution: Fixed Revision 1431216 > The Property2Index eagerly and unnecessarily fet

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-507) MicroKernel.commit() throws NotFoundException for an existing node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549465#comment-13549465 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-507: -- bq. The whole chain of all nodes from child up t

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-507) MicroKernel.commit() throws NotFoundException for an existing node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549460#comment-13549460 ] Mete Atamel commented on OAK-507: - > IIUC a node is considered non-existent if 1) it is not i

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-507) MicroKernel.commit() throws NotFoundException for an existing node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549453#comment-13549453 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-507: -- Forgot to mention that with these changes all te

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-507) MicroKernel.commit() throws NotFoundException for an existing node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger updated OAK-507: - Attachment: OAK-507.patch The attached patch changes CommitCommand to useon the revision as passed i

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-507) MicroKernel.commit() throws NotFoundException for an existing node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13549424#comment-13549424 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-507: -- This is covered with test MongoMKCommitRemoveTes