[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chetan Mehrotra resolved OAK-3188.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Made it optional from oak-core and added it explicitly to oak-run so that it
st
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chetan Mehrotra resolved OAK-3186.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.3.5)
1.3.4
> Assign correct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14696549#comment-14696549
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-3073:
--
[~alexparvulescu] [~mmarth] This is proving to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Saurabh updated OAK-3230:
---
Attachment: OAK-3230-query-engine-should-support-virtual-rows.patch
Attaching [patch|^OAK-3230-query-eng
Vikas Saurabh created OAK-3230:
--
Summary: Query engine should support virtual index rows
Key: OAK-3230
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3230
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Sub
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14696424#comment-14696424
]
Shashank Gupta commented on OAK-3005:
-
[~mmarth]
CachingDS has two layer - Caching layer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14695600#comment-14695600
]
Michael Marth commented on OAK-3005:
[~shgupta],
looking at the above configs from a us
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14695383#comment-14695383
]
angela commented on OAK-3201:
-
i can't tell you what would be suited from an OSGi point of view.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Egli updated OAK-3001:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.3.5)
1.3.6
> Simplify JournalGarbageCollector using a dedicate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14695278#comment-14695278
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-3229:
-
Also, the persistent cache doesn't need to wrap t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Egli updated OAK-2739:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.3.5)
1.3.4
Tentatively setting fix version to 1.3.4 assuming i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Egli updated OAK-2844:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.4)
1.3.5
> Introducing a simple document-based discovery-light
Thomas Mueller created OAK-3229:
---
Summary: Log initialization of the cache and the persistent cache
Key: OAK-3229
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3229
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Iss
Georg Henzler created OAK-3228:
--
Summary: Delayed visibility of new groups when using
PrincipalManager
Key: OAK-3228
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3228
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Georg Henzler updated OAK-3228:
---
Description:
PrincipalManager does not show groups that were just created (this is causing
problems in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14695252#comment-14695252
]
Stefan Egli commented on OAK-2844:
--
marking as blocked by OAK-2739 rather than only related
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14695237#comment-14695237
]
Stefan Egli commented on OAK-2739:
--
[~chetanm], [~mreutegg], re ideas for these integration
Thomas Mueller created OAK-3227:
---
Summary: The DiffIndex relies on implementation details
Key: OAK-3227
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3227
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14695168#comment-14695168
]
Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-2776:
--
fiy, I added some missing license headers with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14695167#comment-14695167
]
Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-2586:
--
fiy, I added some missing license headers with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Reutegger resolved OAK-3226.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Done in trunk: http://svn.apache.org/r1695693
> Remove unused code in Documen
Marcel Reutegger created OAK-3226:
-
Summary: Remove unused code in DocumentNodeStore
Key: OAK-3226
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3226
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Impr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14695018#comment-14695018
]
Thomas Mueller edited comment on OAK-3213 at 8/13/15 10:16 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14695018#comment-14695018
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-3213:
-
After directly discussing this with Julian, we ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14695013#comment-14695013
]
Stefan Egli commented on OAK-2682:
--
PS: I've now changed it so that setting
{{-Doak.docume
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14694987#comment-14694987
]
Stefan Egli commented on OAK-2682:
--
Right, there might be situations where this simplistic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14694942#comment-14694942
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-2682:
-
Another thing I just realized: we need to be care
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14694911#comment-14694911
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-3213:
-
> If uncached documents are needed, would "maxCac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14694905#comment-14694905
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-3213:
-
> > Yes. We would need "Query.maxCacheAge(int)",
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Marth updated OAK-3005:
---
Labels: candidate_oak_1_0 candidate_oak_1_2 docs-impacting features
performance (was: candidate_oak_1_0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14694890#comment-14694890
]
Stefan Egli commented on OAK-2682:
--
Had the same thought - I think this one belongs to a gr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14694884#comment-14694884
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-2682:
-
Routine question: do we want to backport this at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14591837#comment-14591837
]
Shashank Gupta edited comment on OAK-3005 at 8/13/15 8:01 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14694848#comment-14694848
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-2149:
---
The precondition check is not correct. Now it
34 matches
Mail list logo