[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10509) Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 failed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780451#comment-17780451 ] Hudson commented on OAK-10509: -- Previously failing build now is OK. Passed run: [Jackrabbit/

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10509) Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 failed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780408#comment-17780408 ] Hudson commented on OAK-10509: -- Previously failing build now is OK. Passed run: [Jackrabbit/

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10524) SameNameSiblingTest: add (failing) test for getName() semantics

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780365#comment-17780365 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10524: -- trunk: [ca7ea054c2|https://github.com/apache

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10524) SameNameSiblingTest: add (failing) test for getName() semantics

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10524: - Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 (was: ) > SameNameSiblingTest: add (failing) test for getName() semant

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10524) SameNameSiblingTest: add (failing) test for getName() semantics

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke resolved OAK-10524. -- Fix Version/s: 1.60.0 Resolution: Fixed > SameNameSiblingTest: add (failing) test for get

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10522) o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780361#comment-17780361 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10522: -- The test case uses a custom SecurityManager t

[jira] [Created] (OAK-10524) SameNameSiblingTest: add (failing) test for getName() semantics

Julian Reschke created OAK-10524: Summary: SameNameSiblingTest: add (failing) test for getName() semantics Key: OAK-10524 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10524 Project: Jackrabbit Oak

[jira] [Created] (OAK-10523) Basic SNS support returns invalid node names

Julian Reschke created OAK-10523: Summary: Basic SNS support returns invalid node names Key: OAK-10523 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10523 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10509) Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1228 failed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780355#comment-17780355 ] Hudson commented on OAK-10509: -- Previously failing build now is OK. Passed run: [Jackrabbit/

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10522) o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10522: - Description: {code:java} [INFO] Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.index.ReindexIT [ERROR] Tests ru

[jira] [Created] (OAK-10522) o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21

Manfred Baedke created OAK-10522: Summary: o.a.j.o.index.ReindexIT#reindexIgnoreMissingTikaDepThrow() fails with Java 21 Key: OAK-10522 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10522 Project: J

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10478) Update Mockito dependency to 5.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780341#comment-17780341 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10478: -- trunk: [f12b4159|https://github.com/apache/j

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10478) Update Mockito dependency to 5.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10478: - Fix Version/s: 1.60.0 > Update Mockito dependency to 5.x > > >

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10478) Update Mockito dependency to 5.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke resolved OAK-10478. -- Resolution: Done > Update Mockito dependency to 5.x > > >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10478) Update Mockito dependency to 5.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780341#comment-17780341 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10478 at 10/27/23 12:19 PM: ---

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10521) Update Easymock dependency to 5.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10521: - Description: Though Easymock 3 is currently working for us, it's known to be not fully functional

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10521) Update Easymock dependency to 5.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-10521: - Component/s: parent > Update Easymock dependency to 5.2 > - > >

[jira] [Created] (OAK-10521) Update Easymock dependency to 5.2

Manfred Baedke created OAK-10521: Summary: Update Easymock dependency to 5.2 Key: OAK-10521 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10521 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Technical

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10490) Suggest queries return duplicate entries if prefetch is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780330#comment-17780330 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10490: -- trunk: [763031951c|https://github.com/apache

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10486) Resolution of inherited groups may terminate pre-maturely for external users

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780329#comment-17780329 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10486: -- trunk: [da19433ebe|https://github.com/apache

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10491) Indexing: pass a MongoDatabase instance instead of MongoConnection to indexing logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780328#comment-17780328 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10491: -- trunk: [d7816c62b9|https://github.com/apache

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10471) Implement ConflictHandler for UserPrincipalProvider Cache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780325#comment-17780325 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10471: -- trunk: [9c1fd98d68|https://github.com/apache

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10495) Ignore DocumentStoreIndexerIT#parallelReindex* tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780324#comment-17780324 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10495: -- [~amitj] - is there a ticket that is still op

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10495) Ignore DocumentStoreIndexerIT#parallelReindex* tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10495: - Description: The tests are flaky and fail often:  {noformat} [INFO] Running org.apache.jackrabbit

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10487) oak-search-elastic should perform a count request for fastQuerySize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780323#comment-17780323 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10487: -- trunk: [31a3341ac3|https://github.com/apache

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10497) Properties order in FFS can be different across runs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10497: - Fix Version/s: 1.60.0 > Properties order in FFS can be different across runs > ---

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10497) Properties order in FFS can be different across runs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780322#comment-17780322 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10497: -- trunk: [c255d16fed|https://github.com/apache

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10497) Properties order in FFS can be different across runs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10497: - Component/s: oak-run > Properties order in FFS can be different across runs >

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10503) Incorrect operand in incremental FFS can lead to failure during merge step

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-10503: - Component/s: oak-run > Incorrect operand in incremental FFS can lead to failure during merge step

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10503) Incorrect operand in incremental FFS can lead to failure during merge step

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780321#comment-17780321 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10503: -- trunk: [e904e45942|https://github.com/apache

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10505) Make PIPELINED the default download strategy in the indexing job

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780319#comment-17780319 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10505: -- trunk: [d9ab316b2b|https://github.com/apache

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10514) Utility method to remove unmerged branch changes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780318#comment-17780318 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10514: -- trunk: [b0ec30536f|https://github.com/apache

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10504) Add indexing job total duration log message

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780315#comment-17780315 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10504: -- trunk: [380467dbfe|https://github.com/apache

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10518) IndexInfo should have a isActive() method

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780314#comment-17780314 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10518: -- trunk: [a4ca2a5b7a|https://github.com/apache

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-9705) Explain Query tool doesn't show the correct ES query when suggest queries are made

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780312#comment-17780312 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-9705: - trunk: [7b650db0aa|https://github.com/apache/ja

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-9705) Explain Query tool doesn't show the correct ES query when suggest queries are made

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-9705: Component/s: search search-elastic > Explain Query tool doesn't show the correct ES

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-9705) Explain Query tool doesn't show the correct ES query when suggest queries are made

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Fabrizio Fortino resolved OAK-9705. --- Fix Version/s: 1.60.0 Resolution: Fixed > Explain Query tool doesn't show the correct ES

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-9459) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-9459: Labels: candidate_oak_1_22 (was: ) > ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10460) PIPELINED strategy fails with OOME during final merge phase for very large repositories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780308#comment-17780308 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10460: -- trunk: [134b5af793|https://github.com/apache

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10460) PIPELINED strategy fails with OOME during final merge phase for very large repositories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780303#comment-17780303 ] Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-10460 at 10/27/23 11:01 AM: ---

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10460) PIPELINED strategy fails with OOME during final merge phase for very large repositories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke resolved OAK-10460. -- Resolution: Fixed > PIPELINED strategy fails with OOME during final merge phase for very large

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10460) PIPELINED strategy fails with OOME during final merge phase for very large repositories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780303#comment-17780303 ] Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-10460 at 10/27/23 10:49 AM: ---

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-10460) PIPELINED strategy fails with OOME during final merge phase for very large repositories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780303#comment-17780303 ] Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-10460 at 10/27/23 10:49 AM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10460) PIPELINED strategy fails with OOME during final merge phase for very large repositories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780303#comment-17780303 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10460: -- The tests currently fail on Windows: {noform

[jira] [Reopened] (OAK-10460) PIPELINED strategy fails with OOME during final merge phase for very large repositories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke reopened OAK-10460: -- > PIPELINED strategy fails with OOME during final merge phase for very large > repositories > -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-9459) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780299#comment-17780299 ] Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-9459 at 10/27/23 10:17 AM: -

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-9459) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke resolved OAK-9459. - Resolution: Fixed > ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node > h

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-9459) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke updated OAK-9459: Fix Version/s: 1.60.0 > ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node >

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-9459) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780299#comment-17780299 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-9459: - trunk: [9014aff8|https://github.com/apache/jack

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-9459) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780297#comment-17780297 ] Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-9459: - New PR#1183 including [~reschke] 's suggested ch

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-10478) Update Mockito dependency to 5.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Manfred Baedke reassigned OAK-10478: Assignee: Manfred Baedke (was: Julian Reschke) > Update Mockito dependency to 5.x > --