[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6412) Consider upgrading to newer Lucene versions

2022-03-30 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17514499#comment-17514499 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-6412: -- Hi, there is any plan for updating lucene ver

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-9706) Waiting for cluster node lease after mongo repository restart

2022-02-25 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana resolved OAK-9706. -- Resolution: Not A Problem > Waiting for cluster node lease after mongo repository restart > -

[jira] [Created] (OAK-9706) Waiting for cluster node lease after mongo repository restart

2022-02-24 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-9706: Summary: Waiting for cluster node lease after mongo repository restart Key: OAK-9706 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9706 Project: Jackrabbit Oak

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8717) Remove deprecated Guava-based APIs

2021-11-24 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17448561#comment-17448561 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-8717: -- Hi, has anyone had time to check if is ok to m

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8717) Remove deprecated Guava-based APIs

2021-10-29 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17435887#comment-17435887 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-8717: -- Hi, I've attached a patch, it contains the ch

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8717) Remove deprecated Guava-based APIs

2021-10-29 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-8717: - Attachment: OAK-8717-remove-guava-deprecated-usages.patch > Remove deprecated Guava-based APIs > --

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-9607) Test fails when build with empty maven cache

2021-10-29 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-9607: - Summary: Test fails when build with empty maven cache (was: Test fails un build with empty maven c

[jira] [Created] (OAK-9607) Test fails un build with empty maven cache

2021-10-29 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-9607: Summary: Test fails un build with empty maven cache Key: OAK-9607 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9607 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7182) Make it possible to update Guava

2021-10-21 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17432552#comment-17432552 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-7182: -- [~reschke] I was trying to understand what nee

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7182) Make it possible to update Guava

2021-10-20 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17431277#comment-17431277 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-7182: -- I'll do that then, thanks [~reschke] > Make i

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7182) Make it possible to update Guava

2021-10-20 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17431184#comment-17431184 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-7182: -- Hi [~angela], that will definitely work for me

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7182) Make it possible to update Guava

2021-10-20 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17431117#comment-17431117 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-7182: -- Hi guys, is it possible to help in any way wit

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8048) VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions

2021-07-28 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17388525#comment-17388525 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-8048: -- Hi guys, it this on hold or do you already hav

[jira] [Created] (OAK-8945) Cannot apply node restrictions without checking-out the node

2020-03-10 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-8945: Summary: Cannot apply node restrictions without checking-out the node Key: OAK-8945 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8945 Project: Jackrabbit Oak

[jira] [Created] (OAK-8929) Missing configuration steps to define a custom LoginModule in a non-OSGi environment

2020-02-27 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-8929: Summary: Missing configuration steps to define a custom LoginModule in a non-OSGi environment Key: OAK-8929 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8929 Projec

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8048) VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions

2020-02-18 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17039741#comment-17039741 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-8048: -- Sure, no problem.. thanks! > VersionHistory n

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-8048) VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions

2020-02-18 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17039605#comment-17039605 ] Marco Piovesana edited comment on OAK-8048 at 2/19/20 1:14 AM: --

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8048) VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions

2020-02-18 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17039605#comment-17039605 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-8048: -- Hi Julian, yes I did. With the fix I proposed

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8048) VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions

2020-02-17 Thread Marco Piovesana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17038840#comment-17038840 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-8048: -- Hi guys, I know you might all very busy, but i

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8048) VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions

2019-04-23 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16823911#comment-16823911 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-8048: -- Yes Julian, my bad I meant JCR-134 and not JCR

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8048) VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions

2019-04-01 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16806689#comment-16806689 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-8048: -- forgot to say that the patch is made from bran

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8048) VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions

2019-03-31 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16806165#comment-16806165 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-8048: -- Hi all, I would like to propose a solution fo

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8048) VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions

2019-03-31 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-8048: - Attachment: fix-OAK-8048.patch > VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8048) VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions

2019-02-19 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16772067#comment-16772067 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-8048: -- For now, to force the history removal, do I ha

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-8048) VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions

2019-02-18 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16771670#comment-16771670 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-8048: -- Hi Marcel, here the code snippet: {code:java}

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8048) VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions

2019-02-14 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-8048: - Description: Hi all, I'm trying to delete a node and all its versions, but the version history is

[jira] [Created] (OAK-8048) VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions

2019-02-14 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-8048: Summary: VersionHistory not removed when removing node and all its versions Key: OAK-8048 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8048 Project: Jackrabbit Oak

[jira] [Created] (OAK-7890) Cannot restore node version

2018-11-09 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-7890: Summary: Cannot restore node version Key: OAK-7890 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7890 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Bug Affects Ve

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-7879) ACL can be modified on versioned node without having to check-out the node first

2018-11-02 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16673411#comment-16673411 ] Marco Piovesana edited comment on OAK-7879 at 11/2/18 4:59 PM: --

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7879) ACL can be modified on versioned node without having to check-out the node first

2018-11-02 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16673411#comment-16673411 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-7879: -- Hi Angela,   yep sorry, I saw your replay af

[jira] [Created] (OAK-7879) ACL can be modified on versioned node without having to check-out the node first

2018-11-02 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-7879: Summary: ACL can be modified on versioned node without having to check-out the node first Key: OAK-7879 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7879 Project: J

[jira] [Created] (OAK-7481) onParentVersion IGNORE is respected also for unstructured nodes

2018-05-07 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-7481: Summary: onParentVersion IGNORE is respected also for unstructured nodes Key: OAK-7481 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7481 Project: Jackrabbit Oak

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7479) custom property does not respect type

2018-05-07 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16465640#comment-16465640 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-7479: -- Sure, so is not possible to have version-indepe

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7479) custom property does not respect type

2018-05-07 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16465567#comment-16465567 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-7479: -- Hi Marcel, thanks for the clarification, but t

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7479) custom property does not respect type

2018-05-04 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-7479: - Description: I've defined a custom mixin with s single *long* property. When I add that mixin to a

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7479) custom property does not respect type

2018-05-04 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16463834#comment-16463834 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-7479: -- The issue seems similar to OAK-3621 that was cl

[jira] [Created] (OAK-7479) custom property does not respect type

2018-05-04 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-7479: Summary: custom property does not respect type Key: OAK-7479 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7479 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6418) CONTAINS SQL2 parameter does not work

2017-07-05 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16074839#comment-16074839 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-6418: -- Hi Davide, yes I did read the documentation abo

[jira] [Created] (OAK-6418) CONTAINS SQL2 parameter does not work

2017-07-04 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-6418: Summary: CONTAINS SQL2 parameter does not work Key: OAK-6418 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6418 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6015) ACL of versioned node can be modified without checking out the node

2017-04-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-6015: - Description: On a versione node _nodeA_ i can do: {{AccessControlUtils.clear(nodeA, userPrincipal)}}

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6015) ACL of versioned node can be modified without checking in the node

2017-04-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15953206#comment-15953206 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-6015: -- Yes I'm sorry, I wrote checkin instead of check

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6015) ACL of versioned node can be modified without checking out the node

2017-04-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-6015: - Description: On a versione node _nodeA_ i can do: {{AccessControlUtils.clear(nodeA, userPrincipal)}}

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6015) ACL of versioned node can be modified without checking out the node

2017-04-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-6015: - Summary: ACL of versioned node can be modified without checking out the node (was: ACL of versioned

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6015) ACL of versioned node can be modified without checking in the node

2017-04-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15953102#comment-15953102 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-6015: -- Sure, in the test I first grant to "testUser" s

[jira] [Created] (OAK-6015) ACL of versioned node can be modified without checking in the node

2017-03-30 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-6015: Summary: ACL of versioned node can be modified without checking in the node Key: OAK-6015 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6015 Project: Jackrabbit Oak

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-5919) Discrepancy between addAccessControlEntry and clear on versioned node

2017-03-22 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15936737#comment-15936737 ] Marco Piovesana edited comment on OAK-5919 at 3/22/17 5:36 PM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5919) Discrepancy between addAccessControlEntry and clear on versioned node

2017-03-22 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15936737#comment-15936737 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-5919: -- Hi Angela, my bad for also asking a question in

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5919) Discrepancy between addAccessControlEntry and clear on versioned node

2017-03-20 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15933055#comment-15933055 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-5919: -- Does anybody have any hint about this? > Discr

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5919) Discrepancy between addAccessControlEntry and clear on versioned node

2017-03-10 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-5919: - Description: I was trying to change the permissions on a *versioned* node and i found two things th

[jira] [Created] (OAK-5919) Discrepancy between addAccessControlEntry and clear on versioned node

2017-03-10 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-5919: Summary: Discrepancy between addAccessControlEntry and clear on versioned node Key: OAK-5919 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5919 Project: Jackrabbit O

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-12-13 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15745594#comment-15745594 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-3328: -- Hi Marcel, do you know, more less, how long doe

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-22 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-3328: - Attachment: proposed_fix_for_OAK_3328-updated.patch Sorry, i thought i had restored the format for a

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-22 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-3328: - Attachment: proposed_fix_for_OAK_3328.patch Sorry, I had to modify the patch file because my editor

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-22 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-3328: - Attachment: (was: proposed_fix_for_OAK_3328.patch) > checked-in state should only affect propert

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-22 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-3328: - Attachment: proposed_fix_for_OAK_3328.patch Hi Marcel,
I think I've got a solution for the bug with

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-22 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-3328: - Comment: was deleted (was: Hi Marcel, I think I've got a solution for the bug with the relative test

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-22 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-3328: - Attachment: (was: proposed_fix_for_OAK_3328.patch) > checked-in state should only affect propert

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-22 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-3328: - Attachment: proposed_fix_for_OAK_3328.patch > checked-in state should only affect properties with OP

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-22 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15686235#comment-15686235 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-3328: -- Hi Marcel, I think I've got a solution for the

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-21 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-3328: - Comment: was deleted (was: I tried, this is what i did: {code:java} Tree parentTree = TreeFactory.cr

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-21 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15683183#comment-15683183 ] Marco Piovesana edited comment on OAK-3328 at 11/21/16 10:49 AM: -

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-21 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15683183#comment-15683183 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-3328: -- I tried, this is what i did: {code:java} Tree p

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-19 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15674325#comment-15674325 ] Marco Piovesana edited comment on OAK-3328 at 11/19/16 6:25 PM: --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-19 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15674325#comment-15674325 ] Marco Piovesana edited comment on OAK-3328 at 11/19/16 6:25 PM: --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-19 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15674325#comment-15674325 ] Marco Piovesana edited comment on OAK-3328 at 11/19/16 6:22 PM: --

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-17 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15674325#comment-15674325 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-3328: -- Hi Marcel, thanks for the hint. I did try to lo

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-17 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15674020#comment-15674020 ] Marco Piovesana edited comment on OAK-3328 at 11/17/16 3:44 PM: --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-17 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15674020#comment-15674020 ] Marco Piovesana edited comment on OAK-3328 at 11/17/16 3:44 PM: --

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3328) checked-in state should only affect properties with OPV!=IGNORE

2016-11-17 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15674020#comment-15674020 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-3328: -- Hi all, i'm using oak to implement a functional

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4646) How can i remove a registered custom privilege

2016-08-04 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-4646: - Description: I did register a custom privilege: {code} PrivilegeManager privilegeManager = ((Jackrab

[jira] [Created] (OAK-4646) How can i remove a registered custom privilege

2016-08-04 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-4646: Summary: How can i remove a registered custom privilege Key: OAK-4646 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4646 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type:

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-4632) remove node management

2016-08-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana resolved OAK-4632. -- Resolution: Not A Bug there was a mistake in my code > remove node management > -

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4632) remove node management

2016-08-02 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-4632: - Description: I have tow users: _admin_ and _userA_. _admin_ creates a folder and gives JCR_READ pri

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4632) User with with just JCR_READ privilege can delete a node

2016-08-02 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-4632: - Description: I have tow users: _admin_ and _userA_. _admin_ creates a folder and gives JCR_READ pri

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4632) remove node management

2016-08-02 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-4632: - Description: I have tow users: _admin_ and _userA_. _admin_ creates a folder and gives JCR_READ pri

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4632) remove node management

2016-08-02 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-4632: - Summary: remove node management (was: give a user the privilege to remove a node) > remove node ma

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4632) give a user the privilege to remove a node

2016-08-02 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-4632: - Summary: give a user the privilege to remove a node (was: remove node behaviour) > give a user the

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4632) remove node behaviour

2016-08-02 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-4632: - Summary: remove node behaviour (was: User with with just JCR_READ privilege can delete a node) > r

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4632) User with with just JCR_READ privilege can delete a node

2016-08-02 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-4632: - Description: I have tow users: _admin_ and _userA_. _admin_ creates a folder and gives JCR_READ pri

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4632) User with with just JCR_READ privilege can delete a node

2016-08-02 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-4632: - Description: I have tow users: _admin_ and _userA_. _admin_ creates a folder and gives JCR_READ pri

[jira] [Created] (OAK-4632) User with with just JCR_READ privilege can delete a node

2016-08-02 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-4632: Summary: User with with just JCR_READ privilege can delete a node Key: OAK-4632 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4632 Project: Jackrabbit Oak I

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-4530) Session modification discarded when repository closed too soon

2016-07-04 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15361471#comment-15361471 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-4530: -- I was writing the test and i found what the pro

[jira] [Created] (OAK-4530) Session modification discarded when repository closed too soon

2016-07-04 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-4530: Summary: Session modification discarded when repository closed too soon Key: OAK-4530 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4530 Project: Jackrabbit Oak

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-4098) Implementation of clone function for shareable nodes

2016-07-04 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15360947#comment-15360947 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-4098: -- Any news about the implementation of this funct

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-4422) support cluster for FileBlobStore

2016-06-08 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15320593#comment-15320593 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-4422: -- I'll keep that in mind, thanks for your help.

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-4422) support cluster for FileBlobStore

2016-06-07 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15318209#comment-15318209 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-4422: -- thanks Davide, yes this helps. I'm quite new to

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-4422) support cluster for FileBlobStore

2016-06-06 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15316310#comment-15316310 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-4422: -- Yes we use TAR. We have a websphere cluster wit

[jira] [Created] (OAK-4422) support cluster for FileBlobStore

2016-06-02 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-4422: Summary: support cluster for FileBlobStore Key: OAK-4422 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4422 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Created] (OAK-4098) Implementation of clone function for shareable nodes

2016-03-08 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-4098: Summary: Implementation of clone function for shareable nodes Key: OAK-4098 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4098 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-4086) Group membership not verified during permission verification

2016-03-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana resolved OAK-4086. -- Resolution: Not A Problem > Group membership not verified during permission verification > ---

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-4086) Group membership not verified during permission verification

2016-03-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15177932#comment-15177932 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-4086: -- You're right, the problem is generated by my cu

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4086) Group membership not verified during permission verification

2016-03-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-4086: - Attachment: OakUsage.zip Attached is a maven project that reproduces the problem. It contains the cu

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-4086) Group membership not verified during permission verification

2016-03-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15177794#comment-15177794 ] Marco Piovesana edited comment on OAK-4086 at 3/3/16 1:23 PM: --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-4086) Group membership not verified during permission verification

2016-03-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15177794#comment-15177794 ] Marco Piovesana edited comment on OAK-4086 at 3/3/16 1:23 PM: --

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-4086) Group membership not verified during permission verification

2016-03-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15177799#comment-15177799 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-4086: -- I tried the exact same code with jackrabbit 2.1

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-4086) Group membership not verified during permission verification

2016-03-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15177794#comment-15177794 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-4086: -- here is the complete code: {code:java} Session

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4086) Group membership not verified during permission verification

2016-03-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marco Piovesana updated OAK-4086: - Description: I have a group called "MyUsers" containing a user called "marco". I've created a folde

[jira] [Created] (OAK-4086) Group membership not verified during permission verification

2016-03-03 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
Marco Piovesana created OAK-4086: Summary: Group membership not verified during permission verification Key: OAK-4086 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4086 Project: Jackrabbit Oak