[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17681411#comment-17681411
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10001:
--
trunk:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17677321#comment-17677321
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10001:
--
My suggestion is to bump up the Java version in Jackrabbit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17677281#comment-17677281
]
Woonsan Ko commented on OAK-10001:
--
I'm fine with moving Java 11 for Jackrabbit, too. Will the version of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17676886#comment-17676886
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10001:
--
Is there anything in oak-doc that requires an update, except
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17640469#comment-17640469
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10001:
--
Hearing no objections, I'm targeting this for Oak 1.48.0.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17635743#comment-17635743
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-10001:
bq. move to Java 11 as well for Jackrabbit
+1 This is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17635740#comment-17635740
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10001:
--
Or we can move to Java 11 as well for Jackrabbit. No big
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17635738#comment-17635738
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-10001:
bq. how does that affect Jackrabbit as consumer of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17635411#comment-17635411
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10001:
--
To be clarified: how does that affect Jackrabbit as consumer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17635374#comment-17635374
]
Angela Schreiber commented on OAK-10001:
i would do it asap so, if it's easy doable i would do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17635366#comment-17635366
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10001:
--
So, assuming we'll come to consensus for this - is this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17635364#comment-17635364
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10001:
--
See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17635336#comment-17635336
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-10001:
bq. Bump up minimal Java version to 11
+1
> Bump up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17634858#comment-17634858
]
Angela Schreiber commented on OAK-10001:
agreed.
> Bump up minimal Java version to 11
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17634823#comment-17634823
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10001:
--
If we want to somehat abandon 1.22, we'll need to put more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17634787#comment-17634787
]
Angela Schreiber commented on OAK-10001:
+1
regarding:
{quote}
backports to 1.22 might become
16 matches
Mail list logo
