[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13833605#comment-13833605 ]
angela commented on OAK-1232: ----------------------------- afaik there exists another issue stating that Property#getStatus requires read access to the parent node: OAK-212 and OAK-220 IMHO the status of an accessible property should be obtained without taking the accessibility of the parent node into account. am i missing something that would prevent us from doing this? > Improve implementation of Tree.get(Property)Status > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OAK-1232 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1232 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core > Reporter: Michael Dürig > Priority: Minor > > OAK-928 introduced methods for determining the status of a property from a > {{NodeBuilder}}. The implementations of {{Tree.getPropertyStatus}} should > change using these new methods instead of duplicating the logic. > Furthermore the since the {{get(Propert)Status}} methods pre-dates the > introduction of the {{exists}} method, we should also clarify the effect of > calling such methods on a non existing tree. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)