[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14679780#comment-14679780
]
angela commented on OAK-3191:
-
I don't have a strong preference here... alternative patch will f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14679747#comment-14679747
]
Timothee Maret commented on OAK-3191:
-
bq. even today's solution complies with the API
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14679663#comment-14679663
]
angela commented on OAK-3191:
-
it's just a high concern not the highest :-)
since your report su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14661969#comment-14661969
]
Timothee Maret commented on OAK-3191:
-
If supporting backward compatibility is the highe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14660776#comment-14660776
]
Timothee Maret commented on OAK-3191:
-
Thanks [~anchela], ensuring backaward compatibili
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14660710#comment-14660710
]
angela commented on OAK-3191:
-
[~marett], thanks for spotting this. in case of doubt i would rat
