[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3797) SegmentTracker#collectBlobReferences should retain fewer SegmentId instances

2016-06-30 Thread Alex Parvulescu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15356731#comment-15356731 ] Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-3797: -- merged to 1.4 branch with: r1750748 merged to 1.2 branch with:

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3797) SegmentTracker#collectBlobReferences should retain fewer SegmentId instances

2016-06-10 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324068#comment-15324068 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-3797: Patch looks good to me. I would push the filtering for data segment

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3797) SegmentTracker#collectBlobReferences should retain fewer SegmentId instances

2016-06-09 Thread Alex Parvulescu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322264#comment-15322264 ] Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-3797: -- We've recently seen an issue with the queue mechanism where it

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3797) SegmentTracker#collectBlobReferences should retain fewer SegmentId instances

2015-12-16 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15060108#comment-15060108 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-3797: [~amitjain], WDYT? > SegmentTracker#collectBlobReferences should