[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16848947#comment-16848947
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-4007:
-
trunk: (1.3.16) [r1730629|http://svn.apache.org/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16848893#comment-16848893
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-4007:
-
ok, will do
> "reset clusterId tool" in oak-run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16848878#comment-16848878
]
Stefan Egli commented on OAK-4007:
--
+1, yep, sounds like an oversight
> "reset clusterId
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16848876#comment-16848876
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-4007:
---
Yes, that's probably an oversight. Please go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16848827#comment-16848827
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-4007:
-
[~egli], [~mreutegg] - while updating docs for o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15147543#comment-15147543
]
Stefan Egli commented on OAK-4007:
--
[~amitjain], also note that for 1.2 the situation is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15147509#comment-15147509
]
Stefan Egli commented on OAK-4007:
--
Done for trunk (1.3.16) in svn.apache.org/r1730549
> "
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15147186#comment-15147186
]
Amit Jain commented on OAK-4007:
+1, looks good
> "reset clusterId tool" in oak-run
> -
