[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5337) LastRevRecoveryAgent should avoid recovering documents from its own cluster id if the instance is running

2016-12-23 Thread Vikas Saurabh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15772661#comment-15772661 ] Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-5337: Backported to 1.4 in [r1775820|https://svn.apache.o

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5337) LastRevRecoveryAgent should avoid recovering documents from its own cluster id if the instance is running

2016-12-23 Thread Vikas Saurabh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15772308#comment-15772308 ] Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-5337: Thanks for confirming. Yes, the startup case would

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5337) LastRevRecoveryAgent should avoid recovering documents from its own cluster id if the instance is running

2016-12-22 Thread Chetan Mehrotra (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15771712#comment-15771712 ] Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-5337: -- I think intention of that test was to test reco

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5337) LastRevRecoveryAgent should avoid recovering documents from its own cluster id if the instance is running

2016-12-22 Thread Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15770264#comment-15770264 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-5337: --- The change looks good to me. Can you please a

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-5337) LastRevRecoveryAgent should avoid recovering documents from its own cluster id if the instance is running

2016-12-19 Thread Vikas Saurabh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15762391#comment-15762391 ] Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-5337: Linking to OAK-2131, OAK-3079, OAK-3397 and OAK-348