[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16980064#comment-16980064
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-8691:
-
trunk: (1.20.0) [r1868708|http://svn.apache.org/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16956014#comment-16956014
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-8691:
---
This is most likely caused by OAK-7401.
> I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16948739#comment-16948739
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-8691:
---
Merged the ignored test into maintenance bra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16948714#comment-16948714
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-8691:
-
ok.
> Incorrect base state from node builder
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16948711#comment-16948711
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-8691:
---
No, I'm backporting the tests to the mainten
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16948679#comment-16948679
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-8691:
-
Is this important enough to hold the 1.6 release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16948633#comment-16948633
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-8691:
---
Proposed fix, inspired by [~fabrizio.fort...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16948598#comment-16948598
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-8691:
---
Added tests, one of the ignored, which repro
