Re: pam_oath with user_unknown=ignore

2024-03-08 Thread Dirk van Deun
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:41:11PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Dirk van Deun writes: > > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 09:11:54PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > >> Dirk van Deun writes: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > > >>

Re: pam_oath with user_unknown=ignore

2024-03-07 Thread Simon Josefsson via OATH Toolkit general discussions
Dirk van Deun writes: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 09:11:54PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Dirk van Deun writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I really like the fact that you can use user_unknown=ignore to >> > introduce pam_oath gradually, and it

Re: pam_oath with user_unknown=ignore

2024-03-07 Thread Dirk van Deun
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 09:11:54PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Dirk van Deun writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I really like the fact that you can use user_unknown=ignore to > > introduce pam_oath gradually, and it works fine if you use one users > > file to sto

Re: pam_oath with user_unknown=ignore

2024-03-06 Thread Simon Josefsson via OATH Toolkit general discussions
Dirk van Deun writes: > Hi, > > I really like the fact that you can use user_unknown=ignore to > introduce pam_oath gradually, and it works fine if you use one users > file to store all the secrets; but when you use a file per user > (like with usersfile=/oath/${USER}), user

pam_oath with user_unknown=ignore

2024-03-05 Thread Dirk van Deun
Hi, I really like the fact that you can use user_unknown=ignore to introduce pam_oath gradually, and it works fine if you use one users file to store all the secrets; but when you use a file per user (like with usersfile=/oath/${USER}), users that do not have a secret yet do need an empty file