Re: [OAUTH-WG] Scope: why is the format predetermined?

2010-08-16 Thread Laurens Van Houtven
Whoops, turns out we were just abusing scope (ie not in the SAML sense). Sorry; my bad. Laurens ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

[OAUTH-WG] survey: token revocation design options

2010-08-16 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
Hi all, I intend to submit a I-D for token revocation. Based on previous discussions on the mailing list and here at Deutsche Telekom, I see a couple of design options. I would like to share those options with the WG and try to reach consensus on a single option before investing the time to

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Returning HTTP 200 on Error for JSONP

2010-08-16 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
I would like to furthermore track down the relevant use cases. Assuming you are referring to section 5.2.1, how does your client send the access token to the resource server? I'm asking because I think error handling for URI query parameters, Body parameters and Authorization headers could be

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Returning HTTP 200 on Error for JSONP

2010-08-16 Thread Paul Tarjan
Yes, I'm talking about 5.2.1 For JSONP the user's browser is the client. It will make a request by executing some HTML like this: script src=http://graph.facebook.com/me?access_token=...callback=jsonp_cb;/script script function jsonp_cb(response) { if (response.error) { // error out