Re: [OAUTH-WG] Client credentials for native applications: seeking clarification

2011-10-22 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-device-00 Forest schrieb: Thanks for the clarification. The subtle difference makes sense to me, and indeed was what prompted me to address this list in the first place. It *is* subtle, though, and the oauth-v2-22 draft doesn't even hint at i

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rechartering

2011-10-22 Thread Nat Sakimura
Hi. Just a clarification: Although my expired draft is 'request by reference', what was proposed through it at the iiw really is a generalized JSON based claim request capability. It could be passed by value as JSON or could be passed by reference. The later is an optimization for bandwidth const

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rechartering

2011-10-22 Thread Eve Maler
Hi Torsten et al., Prioritizing new work items based on an overarching goal seems like a good idea. If Torsten's goal of making OAuth "the authorization framework of choice for any internet protocol" is more widely shared, it gives a useful basis for assessing the proposals consistently. I thin