[OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested

2012-06-02 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi all, I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming meeting. While the next meeting is still a bit away it is nevertheless useful to hear * whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and * whether you want to present something. I could imagine that these documents will be discussed:

[OAUTH-WG] ABNF elements for suggested WG review

2012-06-02 Thread Mike Jones
Dear working group, It turns out that writing an ABNF for the Core spec pointed out that the syntax of a number of the OAuth protocol elements had not been previously defined. (Thanks, Sean, for having us do this!) I took a stab at specifying appropriate ABNF values for each of the protocol e

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested

2012-06-02 Thread John Bradley
I am attending. John B. Sent from my iPhone On 2012-06-02, at 2:46 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi all, > > I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming meeting. > > While the next meeting is still a bit away it is nevertheless useful to hear > * whether you plan to attend the ne

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested

2012-06-02 Thread William Mills
I will not be attending in person, but will probably attend by conference call. -bill > > From: Hannes Tschofenig >To: "oauth@ietf.org WG" >Sent: Saturday, June 2, 2012 12:46 AM >Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested > >Hi

Re: [OAUTH-WG] ABNF elements for suggested WG review

2012-06-02 Thread William Mills
We've definitely needed full ABNF, this is good.  I don't like the habit of multiple definitions for the same character sets though.  Things like "%x21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-7E" should be named once and re-used. > > From: Mike Jones >To: "oauth@ietf.org" >Sent:

Re: [OAUTH-WG] ABNF elements for suggested WG review

2012-06-02 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2012-06-02 10:10, Mike Jones wrote: Dear working group, It turns out that writing an ABNF for the Core spec pointed out that the syntax of a number of the OAuth protocol elements had not been previously defined. (Thanks, Sean, for having us do this!) I took a stab at specifying appropriate AB

Re: [OAUTH-WG] ABNF elements for suggested WG review

2012-06-02 Thread Barry Leiba
> Things like "%x21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-7E" should be named once and re-used. An excellent suggestion, and one I hope is adopted. Barry ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Re: [OAUTH-WG] ABNF elements for suggested WG review

2012-06-02 Thread Mike Jones
Yep - on my to-do list. I'll publish an updated version after giving people a few days to discuss. Cheers, -- Mike -Original Message- From: barryleiba.mailing.li...@gmail.com [mailto:barryleiba.mailing.li...@gmail.com] On

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested

2012-06-02 Thread Phil Hunt
I am attending. Phil On 2012-06-02, at 0:46, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi all, > > I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming meeting. > > While the next meeting is still a bit away it is nevertheless useful to hear > * whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and > * whether