Re: [OAUTH-WG] Berlin IETF Meeting: Agenda Items?

2013-06-26 Thread Brian Campbell
I'll be attending. I'd like to request some time to talk about the state of the assertion drafts. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-assertions http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer Thanks, Brian On Wed, Jun 26,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Berlin IETF Meeting: Agenda Items?

2013-06-26 Thread John Bradley
Attending On 2013-06-26, at 2:56 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi all, > > please drop us a message if you are planning to attend the upcoming IETF > meeting and if you would like to talk about a specific topic. > It would also be great if you could let us know if you plan to participate >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Four-legged OAuth

2013-06-26 Thread Nacho Coloma
I was expecting to find that someone had seen this problem before and was working towards a solution like forwarding your scopes to the delegate authorization server to get all permissions from the user at once (something similar to the aggregate claims in the OpenID spec, if I read it correctly).

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Four-legged OAuth

2013-06-26 Thread Justin Richer
I think this is the only viable approach if you want to allow for different auth servers in different security domains. Accepting access tokens from somebody else's domain takes a few more steps and rules that the WG hasn't totally figured out yet, though some of us are working on the pieces (t

[OAUTH-WG] Four-legged OAuth

2013-06-26 Thread Nacho Coloma
Apologies if this has been asked before, but AFAIK what I could find do not follow the problem until a valid solution. Let's say I have a website BookFace, which is offering services and using OAuth2 to validate its users. For this example, it is important that BookFace does not keep track of any