Re: [OAUTH-WG] Review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-third-party-authz-01

2014-08-21 Thread Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
Hi Hannes, Thanks for the review. Please see inline > -Original Message- > From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net] > Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 12:21 AM > To: oauth@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-tram-turn-third-party-au...@tools.ietf.org; > gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com

[OAUTH-WG] Review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-third-party-authz-01

2014-08-21 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi all, Simon asked us (Derek and myself) to do a quick review of this document developed within another working group that happens to use OAuth. * Background TURN is a special tunnelling gateway (very much like an IPsec gateway would be) but designed specifically to relay voice/video traffic. T

[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-00.txt

2014-08-21 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : OAuth 2.0 Token Exchange Authors : Michael B. Jones Anthony

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Audit in OAuth 2.0

2014-08-21 Thread Zhanna Tsitkov
Hello Hannes, Thank you for the message. My reply is in-line. On Aug 21, 2014, at 3:18 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi Zhanna, > > thanks for sharing your thoughts with the OAuth group. > > I have been wondering where this audit identifier should go. Are you > talking about putting a new i

[OAUTH-WG] Copyright and IPR Question regarding IETF OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Specification

2014-08-21 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi Jorge, Hi Scott, we need your advice in the OAuth working group. We are about to finalize a specification called 'Dynamic Client Registration' (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-19) and this document intentionally harmonizes work done in two other organizations, namely in Kan

Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-19.txt

2014-08-21 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi Justin, thanks for the quick update. I just double-checked this version of the document with the discussions we had during the last two months and the necessary clarifications have been made (as you indicated in your mail below). I have updated the shepherd write-up, see https://github.com/ha

[OAUTH-WG] IETF#90 Meeting Minutes

2014-08-21 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Sorry for distributing the meeting minutes so late. Here they are: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/minutes/minutes-90-oauth Ciao Hannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Audit in OAuth 2.0

2014-08-21 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi Zhanna, thanks for sharing your thoughts with the OAuth group. I have been wondering where this audit identifier should go. Are you talking about putting a new identifier into some protocol exchanges (and which messages) or are we talking about an implementation issue? Also, when you say you