Re: [OAUTH-WG] review draft-ietf-oauth-native-apps-07

Thanks Denis! On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:37 AM, William Denniss wrote: > Thanks all for the great discussion. I tweaked the discussion on > public/confidential clients to rely more on the OAuth2 definition (it was a > bit duplicative), and I reordered the security

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Conclusion of 'OAuth Security Topics' Call for Adoption

A BCP is still assigned a RFC number. The intent is to have BCP number as well. EG BCP195’s current instance is RFC 7525. The intent is to have a BCP series but the process is largely the same as I understand it. John B. > On Mar 4, 2017, at 3:10 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt