Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-mtls

2018-11-12 Thread Evan Gilman
Thank you everyone for the feedback. I am currently working on the sample text, and should be complete in the next couple days. Apologies for the delay. On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:51 AM Brian Campbell wrote: > > Sure, I think they could be treated as different different > client_auth_methods.

Re: [OAUTH-WG] questions on Seamless OAuth 2.0 Client Assertion Grant

2018-11-12 Thread Dick Hardt
I understand better, thanks! >From an OAuth perspective, this is a client credentials grant. You have added some other checks that may or may not help the security profile, but at the core, you have a private key on the device that is the primary credential, and is device oriented. FWIW: there