Re: [OAUTH-WG] dpop terminogly

Hello you want to better help me understand what is this you referring too? > On Apr 4, 2021, at 5:15 PM, Nikos Fotiou wrote: > > Hi I am wondering if the following terminology is more appropriate for the > DPoP draft (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fett-oauth-dpop-04): > - Since a DPoP

[OAUTH-WG] dpop terminogly

Hi I am wondering if the following terminology is more appropriate for the DPoP draft (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fett-oauth-dpop-04): - Since a DPoP proof is a JWT encoded in a JWS may be it is better to say "DPoP proof payload" instead of "DPoP proof body" (end of page 4). - For the

[OAUTH-WG] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-12: (with COMMENT)

Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

[OAUTH-WG] OAuth Interim Meeting - April 5th - RAR

All, The coming OAuth WG Interim meeting is this coming* Monday, April 5th, at 12:00 pm EDT.* The meeting will be focused on the RAR document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-rar/ The following link has links to the slide and draft and will be used to capture the notes and