Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for Feedback on "SD-JWT VC" Draft Specification

Hi, I support sd-jwt-vc with the will to contribute to its evolution and use it in the wallet solutions under development Il ven 26 mag 2023, 16:57 Oliver Terbu ha scritto: > Dear all, > > I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to introduce "SD-JWT-based > Verifiable Credentials with JS

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-rar use of “WWW-Authenticate” Response Header

There are certainly similarities between authorization details and scope. And yes, both are API-specific to some extent. But scope is generally more coarse-grained while authorization details can have lots of, well, um, very specific details relating deep into the API. So much so that expressing th

[OAUTH-WG] Request for Feedback on "SD-JWT VC" Draft Specification

Dear all, I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to introduce "SD-JWT-based Verifiable Credentials with JSON payloads” (SD-JWT VC): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-terbu-sd-jwt-vc/ This proposal builds upon the existing SD-JWT specification by the OAuth WG and aims to address cert

[OAUTH-WG] Mail list enquirer

Thank you very much for your support Kindly regards, Juan David Kruger ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-rar use of “WWW-Authenticate” Response Header

Thanks for the answer, Bryan! I’m not sure if I understand correctly, the authorization details are API-specific the same as the “scope” right? Let me know if I’m misinterpreting something but for me RAR is an evolution of the scope, because the scope parameter is not useful for complex authori