Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD Review of draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-24

Hi Roman, thanks for the detailed review and your valuable feedback! I think you raise one important point in particular that I'd like to discuss on the list: Am 19.12.23 um 00:08 schrieb Roman Danyliw: ** I struggled to understand what was mandatory in the mix of RFC2119 keywords. (a) Secti

Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD Review of draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-24

Your proposal sounds good to me. Am 28. Dez. 2023, 10:25 +0100 schrieb Daniel Fett : > Hi Roman, > thanks for the detailed review and your valuable feedback! > I think you raise one important point in particular that I'd like to discuss > on the list: > Am 19.12.23 um 00:08 schrieb Roman Danyliw:

Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD Review of draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-24

Hi Roman, thanks again for your feedback! I have a few open questions below, but already incorporated most of your (and Hannes) feedback in the editor's copy: - https://oauthstuff.github.io/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics.html - Diff to published version:

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd Review of draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-23

Hi Hannes, thanks again for your feedback! It is incorporated in the editor's copy now. - https://oauthstuff.github.io/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics.html - Diff to published version: https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?doc_1=draft-ietf-oauth-security-