t; It does not need to have any normative references to 5849.
> >
> > EHL
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org]
> On Behalf Of Bill de hÓra
> >
Why not?
Bill
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 10:10 -0700, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> It does not need to have any normative references to 5849.
>
> EHL
>
> -Original Message-
> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Bill de hÓra
>
[RFC2104] is a normative reference but isn't referred to in
draft-ietf-oauth-v2-10 and all the hmac stuff seems to be gone from
OAuth2 since 06 - so should the [RFC2104] reference be removed?
Bill
___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 20:26 +, David Recordon wrote:
> This draft is now an Internet Draft and I'm curious if anyone has any
> feedback on
> it? http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-upgrade-00
>
replace
[[[
client_id
REQUIRED. The client identifier as described in Sectio
