+1 for adding it in to the core spec..
Thanks,
RD
-----Original Message-----
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Eve Maler
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 1:38 PM
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
Cc: OAuth WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core
specification
+1 for signature support in the core spec (which may look like normative
pointers out to a separate spec module if it turns out there's wider
usage for that module beyond OAuth).
Eve
On 23 Sep 2010, at 6:43 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> Since much of this recent debate was done off list, I'd like to ask
people
> to simply express their support or objection to including a basic
signature
> feature in the core spec, in line with the 1.0a signature approach.
>
> This is not a vote, just taking the temperature of the group.
>
> EHL
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
Eve Maler http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
+1 425 345 6756 http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
