Reviewer: Gonzalo Salgueiro
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned ART directorate reviewer for this document. These comments
were written primarily for the benefit of the ART area directors. Document
editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
comments.
This
ut
> I don't think it is particular helpful.
>
> On May 4, 2012, at 10:49 PM, Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei) wrote:
>
>> I support this doc being adopted as starting point for WG discussion.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>>
>&g
I support this doc being adopted as starting point for WG discussion.
Regards,
Gonzalo
On May 4, 2012, at 3:03 PM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" wrote:
> The above-named draft has been offered as the recommended path forward in
> terms of converging on a single document to advance through appsawg.
s that won't be used, and may hamper adoption.
>
> And Yes I am one of the hard hatred basters that decided to redo openID on
> OAuth rather than trying to graft OAuth functionality onto openID 2.
>
> Keeping what's working working is fine, but not forcing people to
Derek -
On Apr 20, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Paul,
>
> "Paul E. Jones" writes:
>
>> Tim,
>>
>> I do not agree that it's harmful. If I removed the WF discussion off the
>> table, I'm still having a hard time buying into everything you said in the
>> blog post.
>>
>> I implemen
Mike -
I can get behind this approach.
(Note: We already mandated JSON in the current WebFinger spec)
Cheers,
Gonzalo
On Apr 20, 2012, at 1:48 AM, Mike Jones wrote:
> To be clear, making this mandatory would break no clients. It would require
> updating some servers, just as requiring JSON
