+1
Eran, thanks for framing this up...
On Sep 28, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Brian Campbell wrote:
+1 seems like a pragmatic compromise
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Marius Scurtescu
mscurte...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:05 AM, George Fletcher gffle...@aol.com wrote:
+1 I
D
On Jul 8, 2010, at 9:29 AM, David Recordon wrote:
I'm honestly trying to decide myself and a few other people are in similar
situations. Thus a poll:
A) Yes, I'm going to be in Maastricht
B) Maybe, depends on the number of OAuth WG members going
C) Maybe, depends on some other reason
D) No
With Doug in an all day mtg, we have not sync'd on this...so one of us
may respond again on this topic.
I think I am +1 w/ Brian E.
In the flow from SAML gateway to STS to protected resource, I don't see
caching both an access and refresh token as getting me any efficiency.
Certainly, it adds
The amount of writing done on scope the past few weeks indicates this
concept generates a lot of passion. I hope we will spend some time on it
during IIW X and at our 20-May f2f.
For me, delegation is an identity in my system authorizing my system to
issue a toke to an identity, which is not
