Re: [OAUTH-WG] Type Metadata for SD-JWT VC

Jacob, I believe we can always create a CDDL and support other media types in the same way as https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-status-list/ supports CBOR/JSON if this is required in the future. [https://static.ietf.org/dt/12.9.0/ietf/images/ietf-logo-card.png]

Re: [OAUTH-WG] IETF119 - Call for topics

Hi, SD-JWT VC editors would like to discuss SD-JWT VC progress. Thanks, Oliver From: OAuth on behalf of Kristina Yasuda Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 6:45 PM To: rifaat.s.ietf ; oauth Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IETF119 - Call for topics EXTERNAL EMAIL: This

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [SPICE] R: OAuth Digital Credential Status Attestations (typo)

Orie: For the sake of terminology, please note that SD-JWT is a container format similar to JWT, while SD-JWT VC is a credential format that uses SD-JWT. Credentials in the SD-JWT VC format use a specific media type, "application/vc+sd-jwt", populated in the typ header. Cryptographic key binding

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Protected Resource Metadata

I support adoption On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 5:09 PM John Bradley wrote: > I support addoption > > On Aug 23, 2023, at 3:01 PM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > wrote: > > All, > > This is an official call for adoption for the *Protected Resource > Metadata* draft: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jo

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - SD-JWT-based Verifiable Credentials

Thank you very much! We greatly appreciate your insightful feedback and continuous support. As we move forward, we are fully committed to diligently refining the document to meet the rigorous technical standards upheld by the IETF working group. Best regards, Oliver & Daniel (authors) On Fri, Aug

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - SD-JWT-based Verifiable Credentials

I'm an editor and I support adoption as well :) On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 8:13 AM Shigeya Suzuki wrote: > I support adoption. > > shigeya > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2023, at 04:25, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > > All, > > This is an official call for adoption for the *SD-JWT-based Verifiable > Credentials *

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

I support adoption. On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 1:31 AM Wayne Chang wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 12:28 Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > wrote: > >> All, >> >> This is an official call for adoption for the *Attestation-Based Client >> Authentication *draft discussed in SF. >> >> https://datatracker.i

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for Feedback on "SD-JWT VC" Draft Specification

practically, the permissions on servers may not be administered in a way >> that allows tenants to write to this location. (Yes, I plan to continue >> the conversation with Mark Nottingham about allowing .well-known in >> locations other than the root.) >> >> >> >&

[OAUTH-WG] Request for Feedback on "SD-JWT VC" Draft Specification

antly contribute to the advancement of Verifiable Credentials. If you have any questions or require additional information regarding the "SD-JWT VC" specification or its potential impact, please do not hesitate to reach out. I’m looking forward to your feedback! Oliver Terbu -- Direc