> Am 24.07.2019 um 00:02 schrieb Roman Danyliw :
>
> With the IETF LC feedback can you please address this idnit introduced in
> this update:
sure
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://ww
orsten Lodderstedt [mailto:tors...@lodderstedt.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 5:06 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw
> Cc: oauth@ietf.org; Vladimir Dzhuvinov
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD Review: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-
> response-03
>
> Hi Roman,
>
> the latest revision
---
>> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw
>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 8:51 PM
>> To: Torsten Lodderstedt
>> Cc: oauth@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD Review: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-
>> response-03
>>
gt; Cc: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD Review: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-
> response-03
>
> Hi Torsten!
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Torsten Lodderstedt [mailto:tors...@lodderstedt.net]
> > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 6:59 AM
>
Hi Torsten!
> -Original Message-
> From: Torsten Lodderstedt [mailto:tors...@lodderstedt.net]
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 6:59 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw
> Cc: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD Review: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-
> response-03
>
&
Hi Roman,
thanks a lot for your review feedback.
I just published a new revision of the draft incorporating changes based on
your comments.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-04
> On 17. Jul 2019, at 18:17, Roman Danyliw wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The followi
Hi!
The following is my AD review of
draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-03.
(1) Section 4. Per introspection_encrypted_response_alg, how is either signing
or encryption being requested? Is it by also including an
introspection_signed_response_alg? If that's the case, it is worth e
