ks.com
From: Justin Richer [mailto:jric...@mitre.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:50 AM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: Donald F Coffin; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Additional Oauth Dynamic Client Registration
Protocol Information
Additionally, there is an individual draft that reg
ks.com
From: Mike Jones [mailto:michael.jo...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:38 AM
To: Donald F Coffin; Justin Richer
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Additional Oauth Dynamic Client Registration
Protocol Information
Hi Don,
Discovery is a process that h
onald F Coffin
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:30 AM
*To:* Justin Richer
*Cc:* oauth@ietf.org
*Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Additional Oauth Dynamic Client Registration
Protocol Information
Justin,
I understand the current Client Registration request and response
information is based on the O
OAUTH-WG] Additional Oauth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol
Information
Justin,
I understand the current Client Registration request and response information
is based on the OPENID model for consistency, but has there been any thought or
discussion of adding the AS OAuth 2.0 endpoint URIs as
Justin,
I understand the current Client Registration request and response
information is based on the OPENID model for consistency, but has there been
any thought or discussion of adding the AS OAuth 2.0 endpoint URIs as part
of the registration response? I believe the addition of the endpoint
