lient requests.
EHL
> -Original Message-
> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Torsten Lodderstedt
> Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 5:03 AM
> To: OAuth WG
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Breaking change for authorization code flow?
>
>
011 5:03 AM
To: OAuth WG
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Breaking change for authorization code flow?
Hi all,
I just noticed a change between draft 11 and 13 I would like to bring to your
attention.
Until draft 11, the spec left open whether the client of the authz code grant
type had to present a secret o
ary 26, 2011 5:03 AM
> To: OAuth WG
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Breaking change for authorization code flow?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just noticed a change between draft 11 and 13 I would like to bring to your
> attention.
>
> Until draft 11, the spec left open whether the client o
Hi all,
I just noticed a change between draft 11 and 13 I would like to bring to your
attention.
Until draft 11, the spec left open whether the client of the authz code grant
type had to present a secret or not. It had been a decision of the authz server
and I assume some deployments already w
