.@ietf.org 写于 2013-01-21 13:08:39:
>>>
>>>
>>> > This is true. It's possible for the AS to vary it's behavior on
>>> > scope name, but it's presumed the AS and RS have an agreement of
>>> > what token type is in play.
:08:39:
>
>
> > This is true. It's possible for the AS to vary it's behavior on
> > scope name, but it's presumed the AS and RS have an agreement of
> > what token type is in play. Likely a good extension to the spec.
>
> >
> > From: Pr
hink it is
> > meaningful only when the requested type is specified by a RS,
> > and client just relay that request to AS.
> >
> > >
> > > From: "zhou.suj...@zte.com.cn"
> > > To: Prabath Siriwardena
> > > Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG"
d client just relay that request to AS.
>
> >
> > From: "zhou.suj...@zte.com.cn"
> > To: Prabath Siriwardena
> > Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG" ; William Mills
> >
> > Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: Re: Re: [OAUTH-W
t; > To: Prabath Siriwardena
> > Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG" ; William Mills
> >
> > Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: Re: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Client cannot specify the token type it
> needs
> >
> >
> > Well, if RS could speci
rom: "zhou.suj...@zte.com.cn"
> To: Prabath Siriwardena
> Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG" ; William Mills
>
> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Client cannot specify the token type it
needs
>
>
> Well, if RS coul
it's presumed the AS and RS have an agreement
of
> > what token type is in play. Likely a good extension to
the spec.
>
> >
> > From: Prabath Siriwardena
> > To: "oauth@ietf.org WG"
> > Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:28 PM
> > Subject: [OAUTH-W
at token type is in play. Likely a good extension to the spec.
>
> >
> > From: Prabath Siriwardena
> > To: "oauth@ietf.org WG"
> > Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:28 PM
> > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Client cannot specify the token type it needs
>
> &
t; > what token type is in play. Likely a good extension to the spec.
>
> >
> > From: Prabath Siriwardena
> > To: "oauth@ietf.org WG"
> > Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:28 PM
> > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Client cannot specify the token type it needs
>
s behavior on
> scope name, but it's presumed the AS and RS have an agreement of
> what token type is in play. Likely a good extension to the spec.
>
> From: Prabath Siriwardena
> To: "oauth@ietf.org WG"
> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:28 PM
> Subject: [OAUTH-
@ietf.org WG"
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:28 PM
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Client cannot specify the token type it needs
Although token type is extensible according to the OAuth core specification -
it is fully governed by the Authorization Server.
There can be a case where a single AS supports m
Although token type is extensible according to the OAuth core specification
- it is fully governed by the Authorization Server.
There can be a case where a single AS supports multiple token types based
on client request.
But currently we don't have a way the client can specify (or at least
sugges
12 matches
Mail list logo
