Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type

2014-07-22 Thread torsten
-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Bradley Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 12:37 PM To: Phil Hunt Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type It was taken out and then put back in as it is a common parameter used by a number of AS. We have

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type

2014-07-22 Thread Justin Richer
Bradley Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 12:37 PM To: Phil Hunt Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type   It was taken out and then put back in as it is a common parameter used by a number of AS.   We have it in Connect, the best reason

[OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type

2014-07-08 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi all, with version -18 you guys have added a new meta-data attribute, namely application_type. First, this new attribute is not listed in the IANA consideration section. Second, could you provide a bit of motivation why you need it? What would the authorization server do with that type of

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type

2014-07-08 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
This additional information makes a lot of sense. As you said in an earlier mail, the attempt to copy text from the OpenID Connect spec failed a bit... On 07/08/2014 02:49 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote: I suppose authors has imported one of the security feature of OpenID Connect here as well. In the

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type

2014-07-08 Thread Phil Hunt
Does this need to be in the spec? I believe we’ve already said that others can add attributes as they need. Phil @independentid www.independentid.com phil.h...@oracle.com On Jul 8, 2014, at 11:56 AM, John Bradley ve7...@ve7jtb.com wrote: The application_type is collected as part of

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type

2014-07-08 Thread John Bradley
It was taken out and then put back in as it is a common parameter used by a number of AS. We have it in Connect, the best reason for keeping it is to stop people from coming up with a new parameter for the same thing because they haven't looked at the Connect version. John B. On Jul 8, 2014,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type

2014-07-08 Thread Mike Jones
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type It was taken out and then put back in as it is a common parameter used by a number of AS. We have it in Connect, the best reason for keeping it is to stop people from coming up with a new parameter for the same thing because

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type

2014-07-08 Thread Phil Hunt
] On Behalf Of John Bradley Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 12:37 PM To: Phil Hunt Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type It was taken out and then put back in as it is a common parameter used by a number of AS. We have it in Connect, the best

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type

2014-07-08 Thread Richer, Justin P.
. -- Mike -Original Message- From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Bradley Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 12:37 PM To: Phil Hunt Cc: oauth@ietf.orgmailto:oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type It was taken

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type

2014-07-08 Thread Nat Sakimura
-boun...@ietf.org oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Bradley Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 12:37 PM To: Phil Hunt Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type It was taken out and then put back in as it is a common parameter used by a number

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type

2014-07-08 Thread Richer, Justin P.
: oauth@ietf.orgmailto:oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: application_type It was taken out and then put back in as it is a common parameter used by a number of AS. We have it in Connect, the best reason for keeping it is to stop people from coming up with a new