Re: [OAUTH-WG] HTTP/1.0 and JSON

2011-06-16 Thread Justin Richer
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 04:43 -0400, Tim Brody wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:45:28 -0400, Justin Richer > wrote: > >> > I couldn't find a conclusion to the May 2010 discussions about using > >> > x-www- > >> > form-urlencoded vs. json nor a rationale in the spec for using JSON. > >> > Why do I > >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] HTTP/1.0 and JSON

2011-06-16 Thread Tim Brody
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:45:28 -0400, Justin Richer wrote: >> > I couldn't find a conclusion to the May 2010 discussions about using >> > x-www- >> > form-urlencoded vs. json nor a rationale in the spec for using JSON. >> > Why do I >> > need to add a JSON lexer/parser to my library just to get key-

Re: [OAUTH-WG] HTTP/1.0 and JSON

2011-06-15 Thread Justin Richer
> > I couldn't find a conclusion to the May 2010 discussions about using x-www- > > form-urlencoded vs. json nor a rationale in the spec for using JSON. Why do > > I > > need to add a JSON lexer/parser to my library just to get key-value pairs > > that > > can be represented by form-urlencoded?

Re: [OAUTH-WG] HTTP/1.0 and JSON

2011-06-15 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
> -Original Message- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Tim Brody > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 5:42 AM > To: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] HTTP/1.0 and JSON > > Hi All, > > I'm the author of this

[OAUTH-WG] HTTP/1.0 and JSON

2011-06-15 Thread Tim Brody
Hi All, I'm the author of this Perl library for signing OAuth 1.0 requests: http://search.cpan.org/~timbrody/LWP-Authen-OAuth-1.01/ I've been asked about OAuth 2.0 so have scanned through the spec and joined this list :-) The MAC-signing draft section 1.2 refers to "Host:" but I have an HTTP li