Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D: multiple access tokens

2010-07-15 Thread Christian Stübner
Torsten, I came across your I-D when looking for a way to distinguish between different protected resources. Just some remarks and questions: o In 3.1. I suppose your example request is missing the service_id, right? o 3.4. Replace server_id by service_id and you comply with the rest of the

Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D: multiple access tokens

2010-07-15 Thread Christian Stübner
My post was a reply to http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg03639.html. (Something obviously went wrong with the Thread Index.) Regards, Christian Torsten, I came across your I-D when looking for a way to distinguish between different protected resources. Just some

Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D: multiple access tokens

2010-07-15 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
Am 15.07.2010 16:27, schrieb Christian Stübner: Torsten, I came across your I-D when looking for a way to distinguish between different protected resources. Just some remarks and questions: o In 3.1. I suppose your example request is missing the service_id, right? Yepp. o 3.4. Replace

[OAUTH-WG] I-D: multiple access tokens

2010-07-10 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
I just finished the first version of my I-D on multiple access tokens and would like to initiate a discussion whether the WG sees this as a potential WG item. Due to the pre-meeting cutoff date for submitting new drafts, I cannot submit it to the IETF site now. Since I don't want to lose