Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-05.txt

2016-07-17 Thread Mike Jones
, July 16, 2016 4:43 PM To: Phil Hunt Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-05.txt Et tu, Phil? Do Sam and Phil represent the general consensus here or a vocal minority? On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Phil Hunt mailto:phil.h...@oracle.com>>

Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-05.txt

2016-07-17 Thread Justin Richer
I, for one, appreciate the title. It's a token swap, fulfilling and in some ways replacing the complicated functionality of an old-school STS, but in a more REST-friendly fashion. OAuth is not RESTful, nor has it ever intended to be so. It's REST-friendly and that's a good thing. Besides: it's

Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-05.txt

2016-07-16 Thread Brian Campbell
Et tu, Phil? Do Sam and Phil represent the general consensus here or a vocal minority? On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Phil Hunt wrote: > I agree. The title was useful as a working title as it conveyed a lot of > useful intent information to members of the WG familiar with the technology. > >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-05.txt

2016-07-15 Thread Phil Hunt
I agree. The title was useful as a working title as it conveyed a lot of useful intent information to members of the WG familiar with the technology. I don’t think the broader community understands OASIS and the broader realm nor should they care. At minimum it suggests they need to go read abo

Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-05.txt

2016-07-15 Thread Sam Whited
Hi all, Longtime reader / implementer, first time poster. I wanted to comment specifically on the question of the title: On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Brian Campbell wrote: > The title is something I'm less open to changes on. Honestly, I'm really > partial to it. I described it as "really re

Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-05.txt

2016-07-15 Thread Brian Campbell
Thank you, James, for the review and feedback. I apologize for the slow reply - on top of being a busy week this was a difficult one to respond to. It's disappointing to hear that it came off as conceited. That certainly wasn't the intent (though I suppose it rarely is). While I think there's ple

Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-05.txt

2016-07-10 Thread Manger, James
>Title : OAuth 2.0 Token Exchange: An STS for the REST of Us > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-05 This spec has some useful functionality, but comes across as a tad conceited. Suggestions: 1. Drop "An STS for the REST of Us" from the title. "STS" is

[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-05.txt

2016-07-08 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol of the IETF. Title : OAuth 2.0 Token Exchange: An STS for the REST of Us Authors : Michael B. Jones