il.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 10, 2019 at 3:20 PM
> *To: *Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
> *Cc: *oauth
> *Subject: *Re: [OAUTH-WG] IETF105 OAuth WG Draft Agenda
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> I like it! :)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 3:17 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
> wro
th *On Behalf Of * Richard Backman,
> Annabelle
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 17, 2019 11:28 AM
> *To:* Dick Hardt ; Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <
> rifaat.i...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* oauth
> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] IETF105 OAuth WG Draft Agenda
>
>
>
> I’m coming in late to this par
: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IETF105 OAuth WG Draft Agenda
I’m coming in late to this party, but I’ve been asked by a few people about how
AWS handles request signing and our experiences with it. Given the renewed
interest in HTTP request signing and the ongoing work on DPoP, is this
something the working
+1
I like it! :)
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 3:17 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
wrote:
> All,
>
> Here is our draft agenda for the two sessions we have planned for Montreal:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/agenda-105-oauth-00
>
> Please, take a look and let us know if you have any comm
All,
Here is our draft agenda for the two sessions we have planned for Montreal:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/agenda-105-oauth-00
Please, take a look and let us know if you have any comments.
Regards,
Rifaat & Hannes
___
OAuth ma