to be able to assert the primary authentication
method.
Tx!
adam
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Mike Jones
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 7:19 PM
To: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] JSON Web Token (JWT) Specification Draft -10
Draft -10
: [OAUTH-WG] JSON Web Token (JWT) Specification Draft -10
We added on in openID Connect.
acr : Though that is intended as a class reference for things like FICAM LoA 2
etc. You could make class references that only defined the primary
authenticator.
The question is if there is enough
Draft 08 of the JSON Web Token (JWT)
specificationhttp://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-json-web-token-08 has
been published. It uses the -01 versions of the JOSE
specificationshttp://self-issued.info/?p=688 and also contains these changes:
* Removed language that required that a JWT
: Friday, 24 September 2010 10:22 AM
To: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] JSON Web Token (JWT) Specification Draft
Recognizing that there is substantial interest in representing sets of claims
in JSON tokens, Yaron Goland and I have put together a draft JSON Web Token
(JWT) spec
for its retrieval or destruction. Telstra Corporation Limited ABN 33 051 775
556.
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Mike Jones
Sent: Friday, 24 September 2010 10:22 AM
To: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] JSON Web Token (JWT) Specification Draft
] JSON Web Token (JWT) Specification Draft
Recognizing that there is substantial interest in representing sets of claims
in JSON tokens, Yaron Goland and I have put together a draft JSON Web Token
(JWT) spec for that purpose.
To answer the obvious question, while this was produced
Did you intentionally decide not to support encrypting the token?
On 2010-09-23, at 5:22 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
Recognizing that there is substantial interest in representing sets of claims
in JSON tokens, Yaron Goland and I have put together a draft JSON Web Token
(JWT) spec for that
: Sunday, September 26, 2010 9:17 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JSON Web Token (JWT) Specification Draft
Did you intentionally decide not to support encrypting the token?
On 2010-09-23, at 5:22 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
Recognizing that there is substantial interest
]
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 9:17 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JSON Web Token (JWT) Specification Draft
Did you intentionally decide not to support encrypting the token?
On 2010-09-23, at 5:22 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
Recognizing
