[OAUTH-WG] Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2024-10-14 Thread Michael Jones
I’ve applied one change to https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata/pull/62 suggested by Amanda Baber of IANA – changing a “they” to “the Designed Experts”. As it turns out, I was on a call with the IANA people for another reason and was able to review the new text with t

[OAUTH-WG] Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2024-10-10 Thread Michael Jones
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata/pull/62 describes the motivations for the IANA registration procedure, as requested, and closes the loophole. Let me know if you’d like any changes before we merge and publish.

[OAUTH-WG] Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2024-10-10 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Hi Mike, On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 11:01 PM Michael Jones wrote: > -- > DISCUSS: > -- > > I concur strongly enough with John Scudder's comment about the IANA > reg

[OAUTH-WG] Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2024-10-03 Thread Michael Jones
Hi Murray, The IANA registration procedure language was updated in https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-12.html as discussed on today's IESG telechat and per Deb's suggestions to me. It now says: "The IANA escalation process is followed when the Designated Expert

[OAUTH-WG] Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2024-10-02 Thread Michael Jones
Hi Murray. Thanks for taking the time to review the draft. My responses are inline below, prefixed by "Mike>". -Original Message- From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2024 10:13 PM To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metad...@ietf.org; oauth-cha...