Re: [OAUTH-WG] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21: (with COMMENT)

2014-10-17 Thread Brian Campbell
Stephen, I'm working on updating these drafts and as I look again at the text that's in §5. Interoperability Considerations and the requirement in §3 Assertion Format and Processing Requirements to compare these values using the Simple String Comparison (absent an application profile specifying ot

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21: (with COMMENT)

2014-10-16 Thread Brian Campbell
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > > Some stuff needs to be exchanged out-of-band for this to work. > > Entity/issuer/audience identifiers are part of that. This need is > discussed > > in the Interoperability Considerations at > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-o

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21: (with COMMENT)

2014-10-16 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hiya, Mostly fine just a couple of notes. On 16/10/14 20:28, Brian Campbell wrote: > Thanks for your review and feedback, Stephen. Replies are inline below... > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Stephen Farrell > wrote: > >> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for >> dr

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21: (with COMMENT)

2014-10-16 Thread Brian Campbell
Thanks for your review and feedback, Stephen. Replies are inline below... On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line int

[OAUTH-WG] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21: (with COMMENT)

2014-10-16 Thread Stephen Farrell
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refe