Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-15 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
> -Original Message- > From: Justin Richer [mailto:jric...@mitre.org] > Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 2:38 PM > Having a standard set of oauth errors on the protected > resource is a good idea. That said: Not practical. Given the wide range of token types and schemes, each will have to

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-15 Thread Justin Richer
On Behalf > > Of Eran Hammer-Lahav > > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 6:30 PM > > To: David Recordon > > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline > > Friday, March 18 > > > > It's a clear example of

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-15 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
Mike > > -Original Message- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Eran Hammer-Lahav > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 6:30 PM > To: David Recordon > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Error

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-15 Thread Mike Jones
Original Message- From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eran Hammer-Lahav Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 6:30 PM To: David Recordon Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18 It's a clear ex

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-14 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
Me too! :-) EHL > -Original Message- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Phil Hunt > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 10:12 PM > Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-14 Thread Phil Hunt
> EHL > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf >> Of David Recordon >> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 6:04 PM >> To: Mike Jones >> Cc: oauth@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG]

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-14 Thread William J. Mills
11 3:04 PM Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18 As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the OAuth Errors Registry to increase interoperability among implementations using the related OAuth specifications.  As you also k

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-14 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
sage- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of David Recordon > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 6:04 PM > To: Mike Jones > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline > Friday, March 18 >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-14 Thread David Recordon
> -Original Message- > From: David Recordon [mailto:record...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 4:15 PM > To: Mike Jones > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline > Friday, March 18 > > I still haven&#x

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-14 Thread Mike Jones
errors for the same thing. -- Mike -Original Message- From: David Recordon [mailto:record...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 4:15 PM To: Mike Jones Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Frid

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-14 Thread David Recordon
I still haven't seen an explanation of what this registry accomplishes or why it's become needed in the past few weeks. --David On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Mike Jones wrote: > As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the OAuth > Errors Registry to increase interoperab

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-14 Thread Anthony Nadalin
My preference would be option A From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Jones Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 3:04 PM To: oauth@ietf.org Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18 As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-14 Thread Richer, Justin P.
: Friday, March 11, 2011 6:04 PM To: oauth@ietf.org Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18 As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the OAuth Errors Registry<http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-03.h

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-12 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
nd comment > > > > -Original Message- > > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > > Of Lucy Lynch > > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 5:41 PM > > To: Mike Jones > > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Locati

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-11 Thread Phillip Hunt
Lynch > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 5:41 PM > To: Mike Jones > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline > Friday, March 18 > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mike Jones wrote: > >> As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-11 Thread Igor Faynberg
I vote (A) because 1) I strongly believe in modularity and 2) I disagree with D. Hence what applies to all specifications must be defined at the highest level, rather than in a self-contained specification. So, this looked like a simple matter to me. Having said that, I note that Lucy has a d

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-11 Thread Lucy Lynch
! -Original Message- From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lucy Lynch Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 5:41 PM To: Mike Jones Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18 On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mike

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-11 Thread Anthony Nadalin
:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lucy Lynch Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 5:41 PM To: Mike Jones Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18 On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mike Jones wrote: > As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-11 Thread Lucy Lynch
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mike Jones wrote: As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the OAuth Errors Registry to increase interoperability among implementations using the related OAuth specificat

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-11 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18 As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the OAuth Errors Registry<http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-03.html#errors-registry> to increase interoperability among implementations using the related

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-11 Thread Mike Jones
TH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18 Extensibility for the new option would be defined within each spec. It doesn't seem right to put registry in bearer spec. What if one is defining a non-bearer spec? Phil Sent from my phone. On 2011-03-11, at 15:41,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-11 Thread Phillip Hunt
not be extensible. > > > > -- Mike > > > > From: Phil Hunt [mailto:phil.h...@oracle.com] > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 3:35 PM > To: Mike Jones > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline > Friday, Ma

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-11 Thread Mike Jones
. -- Mike From: Phil Hunt [mailto:phil.h...@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 3:35 PM To: Mike Jones Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18 Should option C read: No OAuth

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-11 Thread Phil Hunt
Should option C read: No OAuth Errors Registry, but each specification may specify its own set of errors. Or is this another option and C is different? Phil phil.h...@oracle.com On 2011-03-11, at 3:04 PM, Mike Jones wrote: > As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the O

[OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday, March 18

2011-03-11 Thread Mike Jones
As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the OAuth Errors Registry to increase interoperability among implementations using the related OAuth specifications. As you also know, there has been so