> whoever put metal gates they'll probably be stolen for scrap! [smile]
Gates with tubular galvanised steel framing and mesh-wire, I think
would be adequate and relatively inexpensive. To attempt stealing them
would be difficult (if they are installed correctly) and would provide
little reward ov
I think it should be closed. Although having recently got a bike it
will mean I would have to go over the bridge to get to the other side
of the line! What is going to happen to the ramps leading down to
the subway? They would also need to be closed off or filled in. And
the small bits of land o
Hi All
Earlier I suggested that this was a perfect platform to discuss ADT's
appalling response to David's panic signal and their inability to
commit to a full time vehicle in Observatory.
Garith then emailed me personally suggesting that the reason he
couldn't continue the discussion was because
I like the idea of locking the subway at night - but if they/we/
whoever put metal gates they'll probably be stolen for scrap! [smile]
On Dec 15, 11:59 am, Ian Gilfillan wrote:
> I'm against closing or "filling it in". I used to live in that part of
> Obs, and regularly used the subway, as I'm su
I vote in favour of this
On Dec 14, 2:41 pm, Janet Cronje wrote:
> hello All,
>
> I would be in favour of the subway closing between sunset and sunrise... or
> there abouts. What about Vetus schola locking up and opening up in the
> mornings? This could become a part of their rounds in Obs - loc
I have tried to register on the Google site as a member , however cannot
seem to access it. I will try again. Not sure if this will reach the
group discussion.
Totally agree this subway must must be closed.It is attracting all the
wrong people who simply stroll around the n
I'm against closing or "filling it in". I used to live in that part of
Obs, and regularly used the subway, as I'm sure many people in the area
do. It certainly serves more of a purpose than as a repository for human
waste, and a security risk - people need to get across the railway line.
I'm su
Hi Jonathan
I refer to your mail below.
As stated before we have sent a detail proposal to the committee.
With regards to client numbers etc.. I am sure you will agree that a Google
group is not the platform to discuss these confidential numbers.
We are more than willing to meet with the commi
Hi Garith
Since you seem to have missed them I'll number my questions carefully.
(A hint, questions are the sentences that end with question marks.)
1. Why is ADT so secretive about the number of subscribers in the area?
2. Do you really want us to survey the entire neighbourhood to prove to
you
