Hi Wengang,
Yes, I think so.
I also found another one in dlmmaster.c:3286 which is :" All UNKNOWN
lockres' are sent to..."
Thanks,
Jeff
Wengang Wang 写道:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Jeff Liu wrote:
>> "Following lockres' are still on the "
>> ^ here
>>
>
> I guess "lockres'" means there could be more than
AST is a message the master sends to a node to indicate a successful up/down
conversion of the lock.
BAST is a message the master sends to one or more nodes asking them to
downconvert their lock.
As opposed to smp locks, a dlm lock can be held by a node for as long as
it wants. BAST is the mechan
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Liu wrote:
> "Following lockres' are still on the "
> ^ here
>
I guess "lockres'" means there could be more than one lockres there.
___
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
http://oss.oracle.com/mailm
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:32:36PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So I'm not pulling this. Not until I get the feeling that there is
> consensus.
Linus,
Here are all of the ocfs2 changes without the reflink(2)
system call. The snapshot functionality is still available via the
ocfs2 ioctl
"Following lockres' are still on the "
^ here
Signed-off-by: Jeff Liu
---
fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c
index 4d9e6b2..601c832 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/
Sorry, Please ignore this mail. the email address was mis-configured
when generating this patch. I will send over again.
Thanks,
Jeff
Jeff Liu 写道:
> From: jeff
>
> "Following lockres' are still on the "
>^ here
>
> Signed-off-by: jeff
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c |
From: jeff
"Following lockres' are still on the "
^ here
Signed-off-by: jeff
---
fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c
index 4d9e6b2..601c832 100644
--- a/fs/ocf
