In ocfs2_remove_btree_range, when calling ocfs2_lock_refcount_tree and
ocfs2_prepare_refcount_change_for_del failed, it goes to out and then
tries to call mutex_unlock without mutex_lock before.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi joseph...@huawei.com
---
fs/ocfs2/alloc.c |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3
In ocfs2_remove_btree_range, when ocfs2_reserve_blocks_for_rec_trunc
failed, it should ref_tree before return.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi joseph...@huawei.com
---
fs/ocfs2/alloc.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
index
On 06/10/2013 02:27 PM, Joseph Qi wrote:
In ocfs2_remove_btree_range, when calling ocfs2_lock_refcount_tree and
ocfs2_prepare_refcount_change_for_del failed, it goes to out and then
tries to call mutex_unlock without mutex_lock before.
It's better to merge both into one patch because it's
On 2013/6/10 15:14, Jeff Liu wrote:
On 06/10/2013 02:27 PM, Joseph Qi wrote:
In ocfs2_remove_btree_range, when calling ocfs2_lock_refcount_tree and
ocfs2_prepare_refcount_change_for_del failed, it goes to out and then
tries to call mutex_unlock without mutex_lock before.
It's better to
In ocfs2_remove_btree_range, when calling ocfs2_lock_refcount_tree and
ocfs2_prepare_refcount_change_for_del failed, it goes to out and then
tries to call mutex_unlock without mutex_lock before.
And when calling ocfs2_reserve_blocks_for_rec_trunc
failed, it should free ref_tree before return.
On 06/10/2013 04:01 PM, Joseph Qi wrote:
In ocfs2_remove_btree_range, when calling ocfs2_lock_refcount_tree and
ocfs2_prepare_refcount_change_for_del failed, it goes to out and then
tries to call mutex_unlock without mutex_lock before.
And when calling ocfs2_reserve_blocks_for_rec_trunc
On 2013/6/8 22:34, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to understand why the unlinks (distributed) are slow with
ocfs2. My investigation so far has revealed that ocfs2_try_open_lock
fails on the directory unlinked but works for a file unlinked. This
creates a checkpoint everytime a
On 6/8/2013 5:54 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
From 96df8b4be7f8702913a0245b2312958e2eea6caf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tetsuo Handa penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 21:46:58 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] xattr: Constify -name member of struct xattr.
Since everybody sets
