On 2013-11-26T17:37:27, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> The versioning information is confusing for end-users. The numbers
> are stuck at 1.5.0 while the tools version have moved to 1.8.2.
>
> I suggest removing the versioning system in the ocfs2 module and let
> the kernel version be the guide to de
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 03:59:42PM -0600, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> The versioning information is confusing for end-users. The numbers
> are stuck at 1.5.0 when the tools version have moved to 1.8.2. Remove
> the versioning system in the OCFS2 modules and let the kernel
> version be the guide to d
The versioning information is confusing for end-users. The numbers
are stuck at 1.5.0 when the tools version have moved to 1.8.2. Remove
the versioning system in the OCFS2 modules and let the kernel
version be the guide to debug issues.
Changes since v1:
* Added MODULE_DESCRIPTION
Signed-off-by
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:06:35PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 05:37:27PM -0600, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> > The versioning information is confusing for end-users. The numbers
> > are stuck at 1.5.0 while the tools version have moved to 1.8.2.
> >
> > I suggest removing th
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 05:37:27PM -0600, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> The versioning information is confusing for end-users. The numbers
> are stuck at 1.5.0 while the tools version have moved to 1.8.2.
>
> I suggest removing the versioning system in the ocfs2 module and let
> the kernel version be
Acked-by: Sunil Mushran
You may want to re-add removed MODULE_DESCRIPTION with a short blurb in
some existing files.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> The versioning information is confusing for end-users. The numbers
> are stuck at 1.5.0 while the tools version have
The versioning information is confusing for end-users. The numbers
are stuck at 1.5.0 while the tools version have moved to 1.8.2.
I suggest removing the versioning system in the ocfs2 module and let
the kernel version be the guide to debug issues. However, if
you think versioning is still require
On 11/26/2013 04:40 PM, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> You may want to do the same for the version file in dlm, dlmfs, etc.
>
Thanks. I will do the same for the versioning information in dlm, dlmfs
and cluster. I will post the updated patch soon. More reduction in LOC :)
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:2
You may want to do the same for the version file in dlm, dlmfs, etc.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> The versioning information is confusing for end-users. The numbers
> are stuck at 1.5.0 when the tools have moved to 1.8.3.
>
> I suggest removing the versioning syst
The versioning information is confusing for end-users. The numbers
are stuck at 1.5.0 when the tools have moved to 1.8.3.
I suggest removing the versioning system in the kernel altogether
and let the kernel version be the guide to debug issues. However, if
you think versioning is still required, p
10 matches
Mail list logo