On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:28:17 +0800 Junxiao Bi wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 12/09/2015 05:22 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:09:06 +0800 Junxiao Bi wrote:
> >
> >> commit 8f1eb48758aa ("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue") introduced an issue,
> >> SGID of sub dir was not inherited
Hi Andrew,
On 12/09/2015 05:22 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:09:06 +0800 Junxiao Bi wrote:
>
>> commit 8f1eb48758aa ("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue") introduced an issue,
>> SGID of sub dir was not inherited from its parents dir. It is because SGID
>> is set into "inode->i_m
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:09:06 +0800 Junxiao Bi wrote:
> commit 8f1eb48758aa ("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue") introduced an issue,
> SGID of sub dir was not inherited from its parents dir. It is because SGID
> is set into "inode->i_mode" in ocfs2_get_init_inode(), but is overwritten
> by "mode" w
Thanks Junxiao!
Acked-by: Srinivas Eeda
On 12/06/2015 08:09 PM, Junxiao Bi wrote:
> commit 8f1eb48758aa ("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue") introduced an issue,
> SGID of sub dir was not inherited from its parents dir. It is because SGID
> is set into "inode->i_mode" in ocfs2_get_init_inode(), bu
commit 8f1eb48758aa ("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue") introduced an issue,
SGID of sub dir was not inherited from its parents dir. It is because SGID
is set into "inode->i_mode" in ocfs2_get_init_inode(), but is overwritten
by "mode" which don't have SGID set later.
Fixes: 8f1eb48758aa ("ocfs2: f
