Oct 11 05:15:28 vhaispora01 kernel: cciss0: unsolicited abort f7000250
Oct 11 05:15:28 vhaispora01 kernel: cciss0: retrying f7000250
That's where the problem begins. The cciss driver is unable to to
complete the
ios due to a bus reset maybe. Ping HP or whoever your contact is for the
MSA500.
I have a RedHat Enterprise Linux 4.0 two node cluster on HP ProLiant
ML350 Servers connected to an HP MSA500 with HP 532 SCSI adapters (cciss
driver).
The following list includes critical component versions:
ocfs2console-1.2.1-1 Mon 28 Aug 2006 05:39:20
PM EDT
ocfs2-2.6.9-4
Fabio Corazza wrote:
Last but not least.. a question for Sunil if he's gonna read this.. when
OCFS2 will support data-on-inode would we need to reformat the file
systems or will the new module be compatible with the <1.4 on-disk data?
I am envisioning a compat flag to be added on existing volu
It's well known problem and very long lasting
request.
Cluster system MUST have more than 1 heartbeat,
esp. if it can self-fence.
Temporary solutions - bonding, using loopback +
ocpf routing (why not?) , etc - can't garantee normal work in some
scenarios.
Btw, new SLES10 promise to hav
What's about integrating OFCVSv2 and heartbeat2? Novell show such system on
last LinuxWorld.
It can be the best idea. Today I saw a few times, when
- we have a few nodes, each have OCFSv2, heartbeat, Oracle RAC, and so on;
- they don't interact;
- in case of failure (disk, network, so on), differ
Alexei_Roudnev wrote:
> It can be correct, but EVMS (which supports clustering) != lvm2 .
>
> But I believe, that adding too many new components into existing Linux (such
> as RHEL4 + GFS + EVMS + heartBeat + GLM)
> means a very high possibility to catch a bug (and so have very low
> reliability).
Alexei... you've found new friends.. :-)
Jokes apart, this is already in the OCFS2 wishlist but I don't know if
the developers are already working on it.
Fabio
Humpherys Philip D Contr 532 CMMXS/CL wrote:
> As I understand, Ocfs2's heartbeat is disk-based. Ocfs2 also requires
> every node to
As I understand, Ocfs2's heartbeat is
disk-based. Ocfs2 also requires every node to be on the network. If
a node disappears from the network, ocfs2 fences. What I'd like to
find out is if you can put the nodes on 2 more more networks, say a private
network, and configure such that ocfs2
Sunil Mushran wrote:
As the ocfs2 home page suggests, when building 1.2.x against mainline
2.6.14 and above, specify GENERIC_DELETE_INODE_NOT_TRUNCATES=1.
Thanks ... haven't followed up on all the bulletin updates. Lots of good
stuff there; I'll take a look. Thank you.
Regards
Peter Lars
As the ocfs2 home page suggests, when building 1.2.x against mainline
2.6.14 and above, specify GENERIC_DELETE_INODE_NOT_TRUNCATES=1.
Peter Larsen wrote:
I'm running 1.2.2 here - compiled from source, and while I can read
files, trying to delete a file on my OCFS2 volume produces the following:
10 matches
Mail list logo
