Sunil,
Its 1.4
On 11/17/2011 11:35 AM, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> It must be the same fragmentation issue that we've addressed in 1.6
> and later.
> Is this 1.4?
>
> On 11/17/2011 08:45 AM, David wrote:
>> Sunil, et al,
>>
>> The reason I needed to make this changed was because the ocfs2
>> par
Hello Everyone,
Coming accross this once in a while. It's the test environemnt so not
very important, and
it does take a lot of abuse. Maybe it's of interest to someone.
Starting cluster:
Checking if cluster has been disabled at boot... [ OK ]
Checking Network Manager... [ OK ]
Glob
It must be the same fragmentation issue that we've addressed in 1.6 and later.
Is this 1.4?
On 11/17/2011 08:45 AM, David wrote:
> Sunil, et al,
>
> The reason I needed to make this changed was because the ocfs2 partition,
> which is 101G in size with 41G currently in use ran out of disk space ev
Sunil, et al,
The reason I needed to make this changed was because the ocfs2
partition, which is 101G in size with 41G currently in use ran out of
disk space even though the OS was reporting 60G available.
I had this issue once before and found that the node slot of that
cluster was set to 4 e
