What is the block size?
-Original Message-
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Josep Guerrero
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 4:43 PM
To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-users] How long for an fsck?
I have a cl
In a two-node setup, node 0 will survive, because that's the node with the
lowest node number (as defined in cluster.conf).
You may want to think about adding a third [FAKE] node; if this is a
feasible workaround, then only the troublesome node should fence itself.
-Original Message
Here are some hints:
- Starting with versions 1.2.5 and later, the ocfs2 network timeout
may be configured.
- If using network bonding, you should set the network idle timeout to
at least 30 seconds.
- Set O2CB_IDLE_TIMEOUT_MS to at least 3. If the problem persists,
set it
Please, let us know when you're back!
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Edward C Cheadle
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 1:02 AM
To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-users] AUTO: Edward C Cheadle is out of the office.
(retur
Seems to be working...
Spam folder?
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Kristiansen Morten
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 2:16 PM
To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-users] problems with mailing list?
Hi,
I havent
If you could afford a maintenance downtime, skip the rolling upgrades and do
it in one shot, all together.
-Original Message-
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Kristiansen Morten
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 1:05 PM
To: Ta
he second issue, slow copy; try to ftp instead (internally, on the
same host; ssh to the other lan then ftp get, dummy workaround, but works
sometimes, and normally faster than the standard cp).
Hope that help
Best regards,
Karim Alkhayer
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mai
bonding should be fine if the above is considered.
Best regards,
Karim Alkhayer
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Raheel Akhtar
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 5:09 PM
To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-users] NIC Bonding
How is it possible to override O2NET_IDLE_TIMEOUT_SECS(value
=10)O2NET_KEEPALIVE_DELAY_SECS (value=5), assuming that OCFS2 is the bundled
(precompiled)release with SLES9 SP3?
in ocfs2/cluster/tcp_internal.h
#define O2NET_KEEPALIVE_DELAY_SECS 5
#define O2NET_IDLE_TIMEOUT_SE
associated
with orphaned files.
Let us know how it goes!
Best regards,
Karim Alkhayer
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Gonçalo Borges
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 4:35 PM
To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-users] How
ure resolution can be applied in a situation where you have
setup a net bonding for the interconnects, which is highly recommended.
Best regards,
Karim Alkhayer
-Original Message-
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Joh
6:42 PM
To: Karim Alkhayer; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Encountered disk I/O error 19502
Hi,
We already have TAF implemented, unfortunately that doesn't help. It suppose
TAF might help if the instance was terminated, but that's not happening
instead it termina
ELECT)
5. Client awareness of a Failover
Can we have an overview of the database setup, nature of transactions, and
parameters?
It would also help to examine the troublesome node behavior and recovery
measures.
Best regards,
Karim Alkhayer
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.co
fencing
I'd suggest that you re-think of that redo volume, why didn't you go with
the standard-simple dataguard configuration?
-Original Message-
From: Mehmet Can ÖNAL [mailto:mco...@fintek.com.tr]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 4:00 PM
To: Karim Alkhayer; Sunil Mushran
Cc: o
How long does the switchover take?
I believe that if O2CB_HEARTBEAT_THRESHOLD value is greater than the time
taken to complete the switchover, then you'd overcome the reboot issue.
Let me know your thoughts.
Best regards,
Karim
-Original Message-
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
-sized, similar to
the ocr and voting disks creation
The final product should be quite interesting!
Cheers,
Karim
From: Schmitter, Martin [mailto:martin.schmit...@opitz-consulting.de]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 4:26 PM
To: Karim Alkhayer; lfreita...@yahoo.com; ocfs2-users
,
Karim
From: Schmitter, Martin [mailto:martin.schmit...@opitz-consulting.de]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 3:52 PM
To: Karim Alkhayer; lfreita...@yahoo.com; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: AW: [Ocfs2-users] ASM over OCFS2 vs. Standard locally managed
tablespaces
Hi Karim
We're using OCFS2 for RAC on top of SLES9, which we're going to upgrade to
SLES10. Around 10 TB RAID6 multi disk arrays, 5 databases on RAC, and 5
single instances standby for the primary site
As there is no AI component in ASM to detect the fast LUNs, and RAC on SLES
requires a shared file sy
Hello All,
Are there any benchmarks with respect to performance with respect to ASM
over OCFS2 vs. standard locally managed tablespaces?
In our environment, data files hosting tables/lobs are stored on a RAID6
disk array with 10K rpm disks, whilst indices are stored on a different
RAID6 disk
>> Hello All,
>> We've been finally given the green light to consider the upgrade to the
latest available OCFS2 version
>> Currently, we're running RAC 10.1.0.5 on a two-nodes cluster, and there
are no plans at the moment to upgrade Oracle software version
>> My concerns are the following:
>> 1)
time
> Best regards,
> Karim
-Original Message-
From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 8:36 PM
To: Karim Alkhayer
Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] o2quo_make_decision
Means the network connection between two no
Sunil,
> Any clue what this means?
> Feb 3 12:47:12 oracle2d kernel: (19,1):o2quo_make_decision:144 ERROR:
fencing this node because it is connected to a half-quorum of 1 out of 2
nodes which doesn't include the lowest active node 1
> Feb 3 12:47:12 oracle2d kernel: (19,1):o2hb_stop_all_region
oracle.com] On Behalf Of Alex Mestiashvili
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:40 AM
To: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] ocfs2 hosts reboot under load
Karim Alkhayer wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
> Try to increase the value of "Heartbeat dead threshold"
> 5 minutes could
Hi Alexander,
Try to increase the value of "Heartbeat dead threshold"
5 minutes could be acceptable for the preliminary testing under load
This will allow you to assess the problem before the node(s) die
Best regards,
Karim
-Original Message-
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mail
: Monday, January 26, 2009 7:52 PM
To: Karim Alkhayer
Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] How to force node [a] to consider node [b] dead?
You are running a 3 year old version of the fs. Please upgrade
to something more current. Like sles9 sp4 or sles10 sp1 that
bundles ocfs2
Hi All,
We have O2CB_HEARTBEAT_THRESHOLD set to 601 as the SAN gets overloaded
sometimes and hence causing the nodes to panic
This value has proven to be more stable than 31. However, there are
sometimes where one of the nodes, for instance node [b] crashes, for
whatever reason. While atte
Joel,
What happens if you shutdown all the nodes, startup the troublesome node
alone; will it succeed?
Cheers,
Karim
From: ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-boun...@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of Joel Freeman
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 5:17 PM
To: ocfs2-users@os
-Original Message-
From: Luis Freitas [mailto:lfreita...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 3:30 PM
To: Karim Alkhayer
Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: RE: [Ocfs2-users] Filesystem Block Size w// DB_BLOCK_SIZE
Karim,
Even if they wont upgrade the entire system,
houghts
Cheers,
Karim
-Original Message-
From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 11:57 PM
To: Karim Alkhayer
Cc: lfreita...@yahoo.com; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Filesystem Block Size w// DB_BLOCK_SIZE
True.
The onl
Hello All,
We're hosting DB1 and DB2 with db_block_size set to 8K, 16K respectively
File system creation is done with mkfs.ocfs2 -b 4K -C 32K -N 4 -L LABLE
/dev/mapper/
Mount is done with: ocfs2 _netdev,datavolume,nointr 0 0
I'd like to know if we can separate most of the ta
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 7:49 PM
To: Karim Alkhayer
Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] OCFS2 Upgrade
That's sles9 sp3. Would recommend you upgrade to
sles9 sp4 and get the latest kernel. That will get you
ocfs2 1.2.9.
However, if you wish the upgra
Hello All,
What is the latest OCFS2 version we can upgrade to, and what are the
options?
Current OCFS2 version is1.2.1
Current OCFS2 components:
ocfs2-tools-1.1.4-0.5
ocfs2console-1.1.4-0.5
Current OS:
# uname -r
Kernel 2.6.5-7.257-default
# cat /etc/SuSE-release
SUSE LINUX Enterprise
32 matches
Mail list logo
